Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value was 296,552 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
296,552 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 5.6%
Rank
12th
of 15 groups
All-time high
296,552 1000 Int$
in 2024
All-time low
88,007 1000 Int$
in 1994
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) recorded 296,552 1000 Int$ for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in 2024. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.
That represents a change of up 5.6% on the previous year and up 79.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 296,552 1000 Int$ in 2024 and was at its lowest, 88,007 1000 Int$, in 1994.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 112,172 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 117,315 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 1963 | 125,528 1000 Int$ | +7.0% |
| 1964 | 111,847 1000 Int$ | -10.9% |
| 1965 | 109,811 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 1966 | 121,195 1000 Int$ | +10.4% |
| 1967 | 135,078 1000 Int$ | +11.5% |
| 1968 | 147,110 1000 Int$ | +8.9% |
| 1969 | 155,556 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 1970 | 175,120 1000 Int$ | +12.6% |
| 1971 | 176,714 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 1972 | 176,721 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 173,544 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 1974 | 165,775 1000 Int$ | -4.5% |
| 1975 | 161,899 1000 Int$ | -2.3% |
| 1976 | 170,515 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1977 | 159,765 1000 Int$ | -6.3% |
| 1978 | 146,111 1000 Int$ | -8.5% |
| 1979 | 148,849 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1980 | 152,908 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1981 | 155,905 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1982 | 146,439 1000 Int$ | -6.1% |
| 1983 | 156,127 1000 Int$ | +6.6% |
| 1984 | 163,515 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1985 | 167,839 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1986 | 177,411 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 1987 | 192,428 1000 Int$ | +8.5% |
| 1988 | 200,548 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1989 | 200,711 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1990 | 118,740 1000 Int$ | -40.8% |
| 1991 | 94,265 1000 Int$ | -20.6% |
| 1992 | 111,370 1000 Int$ | +18.1% |
| 1993 | 134,409 1000 Int$ | +20.7% |
| 1994 | 88,007 1000 Int$ | -34.5% |
| 1995 | 98,227 1000 Int$ | +11.6% |
| 1996 | 120,929 1000 Int$ | +23.1% |
| 1997 | 171,541 1000 Int$ | +41.9% |
| 1998 | 176,028 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1999 | 215,451 1000 Int$ | +22.4% |
| 2000 | 222,253 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 2001 | 218,993 1000 Int$ | -1.5% |
| 2002 | 220,605 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2003 | 212,114 1000 Int$ | -3.8% |
| 2004 | 233,064 1000 Int$ | +9.9% |
| 2005 | 241,327 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 2006 | 218,869 1000 Int$ | -9.3% |
| 2007 | 245,763 1000 Int$ | +12.3% |
| 2008 | 209,086 1000 Int$ | -14.9% |
| 2009 | 175,545 1000 Int$ | -16.0% |
| 2010 | 182,779 1000 Int$ | +4.1% |
| 2011 | 185,511 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 2012 | 204,991 1000 Int$ | +10.5% |
| 2013 | 197,550 1000 Int$ | -3.6% |
| 2014 | 165,358 1000 Int$ | -16.3% |
| 2015 | 176,422 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 2016 | 176,942 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2017 | 185,358 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 2018 | 216,824 1000 Int$ | +17.0% |
| 2019 | 237,238 1000 Int$ | +9.4% |
| 2020 | 236,658 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 2021 | 256,808 1000 Int$ | +8.5% |
| 2022 | 258,258 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 2023 | 280,702 1000 Int$ | +8.7% |
| 2024 | 296,552 1000 Int$ | +5.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 126,179 1000 Int$ | 109,811 1000 Int$ | 155,556 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 165,501 1000 Int$ | 146,111 1000 Int$ | 176,721 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 171,383 1000 Int$ | 146,439 1000 Int$ | 200,711 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 132,897 1000 Int$ | 88,007 1000 Int$ | 215,451 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 219,762 1000 Int$ | 175,545 1000 Int$ | 245,763 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 192,897 1000 Int$ | 165,358 1000 Int$ | 237,238 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 265,796 1000 Int$ | 236,658 1000 Int$ | 296,552 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- 9 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 2,388 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Myanmar 415,147 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Brazil 331,404 1000 Int$ compare
- 10 Timor-Leste 189 1000 Int$ compare
- 11 Ghana 171,564 1000 Int$ compare
- 12 Liberia 163,269 1000 Int$ compare
- 13 Guatemala 120,409 1000 Int$ compare
- 14 Mexico 114,880 1000 Int$ compare
- 15 Sri Lanka 87,065 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate 2.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate -0.9081 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 4.33 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Production, annual growth rate 3.38 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.3601 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 1.89 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Production, annual growth rate 3.62 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate 2.71 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth 1.06 % change on previous year (2024)
- Poultry Birds — Stocks, annual growth rate 2.66 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 296,552 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 296,552 1000 Int$ in 2024.
- What is the lowest natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 88,007 1000 Int$ in 1994.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th out of 15 groups with data for 2024.
- Is natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 79.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.