Natural honey — Gross Production Value in Pakistan
Pakistan: Natural honey — Gross Production Value was 159,086 1000 SLC in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
159,086 1000 SLC
Change on year
up 5.5%
World rank
47th
of 99 countries
All-time high
159,086 1000 SLC
in 2024
All-time low
14,439 1000 SLC
in 1972
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Natural honey — Gross Production Value in Pakistan, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.
Analysis
In 2024, natural honey — gross production value in Pakistan stood at 159,086 1000 SLC. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.
The figure is up 5.5% on the previous year and up 20.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural honey — gross production value in Pakistan peaked at 159,086 1000 SLC in 2024 and was at its lowest, 14,439 1000 SLC, in 1972.
Pakistan ranks 47th of 99 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | 1000 SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 15,306 1000 SLC | — |
| 1962 | 15,306 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 15,306 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 17,423 1000 SLC | +13.8% |
| 1965 | 17,423 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 17,423 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 17,423 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 17,423 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 17,808 1000 SLC | +2.2% |
| 1970 | 17,086 1000 SLC | -4.1% |
| 1971 | 15,643 1000 SLC | -8.4% |
| 1972 | 14,439 1000 SLC | -7.7% |
| 1973 | 14,439 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 14,680 1000 SLC | +1.7% |
| 1975 | 14,921 1000 SLC | +1.6% |
| 1976 | 15,161 1000 SLC | +1.6% |
| 1977 | 15,402 1000 SLC | +1.6% |
| 1978 | 15,643 1000 SLC | +1.6% |
| 1979 | 15,883 1000 SLC | +1.5% |
| 1980 | 15,883 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 16,124 1000 SLC | +1.5% |
| 1982 | 16,364 1000 SLC | +1.5% |
| 1983 | 16,364 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 16,557 1000 SLC | +1.2% |
| 1985 | 16,725 1000 SLC | +1.0% |
| 1986 | 16,846 1000 SLC | +0.7% |
| 1987 | 17,207 1000 SLC | +2.1% |
| 1988 | 17,375 1000 SLC | +1.0% |
| 1989 | 17,375 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 17,568 1000 SLC | +1.1% |
| 1991 | 22,007 1000 SLC | +25.3% |
| 1992 | 22,308 1000 SLC | +1.4% |
| 1993 | 22,610 1000 SLC | +1.4% |
| 1994 | 22,911 1000 SLC | +1.3% |
| 1995 | 27,132 1000 SLC | +18.4% |
| 1996 | 30,146 1000 SLC | +11.1% |
| 1997 | 36,175 1000 SLC | +20.0% |
| 1998 | 39,190 1000 SLC | +8.3% |
| 1999 | 42,205 1000 SLC | +7.7% |
| 2000 | 45,219 1000 SLC | +7.1% |
| 2001 | 45,219 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 45,219 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 60,292 1000 SLC | +33.3% |
| 2004 | 90,438 1000 SLC | +50.0% |
| 2005 | 120,584 1000 SLC | +33.3% |
| 2006 | 120,584 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 120,584 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 120,584 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 120,584 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 120,584 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 120,584 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 126,614 1000 SLC | +5.0% |
| 2013 | 129,628 1000 SLC | +2.4% |
| 2014 | 132,318 1000 SLC | +2.1% |
| 2015 | 126,227 1000 SLC | -4.6% |
| 2016 | 130,184 1000 SLC | +3.1% |
| 2017 | 128,047 1000 SLC | -1.6% |
| 2018 | 125,587 1000 SLC | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 127,596 1000 SLC | +1.6% |
| 2020 | 131,199 1000 SLC | +2.8% |
| 2021 | 135,540 1000 SLC | +3.3% |
| 2022 | 141,687 1000 SLC | +4.5% |
| 2023 | 150,731 1000 SLC | +6.4% |
| 2024 | 159,086 1000 SLC | +5.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,760 1000 SLC | 15,306 1000 SLC | 17,808 1000 SLC | 9 |
| 1970s | 15,330 1000 SLC | 14,439 1000 SLC | 17,086 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1980s | 16,682 1000 SLC | 15,883 1000 SLC | 17,375 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1990s | 28,225 1000 SLC | 17,568 1000 SLC | 42,205 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2000s | 88,931 1000 SLC | 45,219 1000 SLC | 120,584 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2010s | 126,737 1000 SLC | 120,584 1000 SLC | 132,318 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2020s | 143,649 1000 SLC | 131,199 1000 SLC | 159,086 1000 SLC | 5 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
More agriculture & rural data for Pakistan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 6.28 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2302 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 367.4 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.984 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6047 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 23.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 23.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 4.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural honey — gross production value in Pakistan?
- Natural honey — gross production value in Pakistan was 159,086 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest natural honey — gross production value recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 159,086 1000 SLC in 2024.
- What is the lowest natural honey — gross production value recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 14,439 1000 SLC in 1972.
- How does Pakistan rank for natural honey — gross production value?
- Pakistan ranks 47th out of 99 countries with data for 2024.
- Is natural honey — gross production value rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.