Natural honey — Gross Production Value in Uruguay
Uruguay: Natural honey — Gross Production Value was 41,803 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
41,803 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 10.9%
World rank
32nd
of 135 countries
All-time high
55,818 1000 Int$
in 2007
All-time low
1,732 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Natural honey — Gross Production Value in Uruguay, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for natural honey — gross production value in Uruguay is 41,803 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 10.9% on the previous year and down 3.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural honey — gross production value in Uruguay peaked at 55,818 1000 Int$ in 2007 and was at its lowest, 1,732 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places Uruguay 32nd out of 135 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1,732 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 1,981 1000 Int$ | +14.4% |
| 1963 | 2,161 1000 Int$ | +9.1% |
| 1964 | 2,701 1000 Int$ | +25.0% |
| 1965 | 2,521 1000 Int$ | -6.7% |
| 1966 | 2,236 1000 Int$ | -11.3% |
| 1967 | 2,521 1000 Int$ | +12.7% |
| 1968 | 2,701 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1969 | 2,161 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 1970 | 2,420 1000 Int$ | +12.0% |
| 1971 | 3,421 1000 Int$ | +41.4% |
| 1972 | 3,601 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 1973 | 4,321 1000 Int$ | +20.0% |
| 1974 | 5,402 1000 Int$ | +25.0% |
| 1975 | 5,402 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 5,762 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 1977 | 3,601 1000 Int$ | -37.5% |
| 1978 | 5,402 1000 Int$ | +50.0% |
| 1979 | 5,402 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 5,214 1000 Int$ | -3.5% |
| 1981 | 10,803 1000 Int$ | +107.2% |
| 1982 | 12,604 1000 Int$ | +16.7% |
| 1983 | 12,604 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 12,964 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1985 | 13,504 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1986 | 16,205 1000 Int$ | +20.0% |
| 1987 | 18,006 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1988 | 23,407 1000 Int$ | +30.0% |
| 1989 | 15,377 1000 Int$ | -34.3% |
| 1990 | 14,945 1000 Int$ | -2.8% |
| 1991 | 21,607 1000 Int$ | +44.6% |
| 1992 | 20,439 1000 Int$ | -5.4% |
| 1993 | 25,208 1000 Int$ | +23.3% |
| 1994 | 19,806 1000 Int$ | -21.4% |
| 1995 | 27,009 1000 Int$ | +36.4% |
| 1996 | 25,208 1000 Int$ | -6.7% |
| 1997 | 28,809 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1998 | 21,607 1000 Int$ | -25.0% |
| 1999 | 39,613 1000 Int$ | +83.3% |
| 2000 | 18,006 1000 Int$ | -54.5% |
| 2001 | 36,011 1000 Int$ | +100.0% |
| 2002 | 36,566 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 2003 | 35,860 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 2004 | 47,535 1000 Int$ | +32.6% |
| 2005 | 36,011 1000 Int$ | -24.2% |
| 2006 | 47,535 1000 Int$ | +32.0% |
| 2007 | 55,818 1000 Int$ | +17.4% |
| 2008 | 36,011 1000 Int$ | -35.5% |
| 2009 | 28,809 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 2010 | 29,547 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 2011 | 54,129 1000 Int$ | +83.2% |
| 2012 | 41,446 1000 Int$ | -23.4% |
| 2013 | 46,642 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 2014 | 43,430 1000 Int$ | -6.9% |
| 2015 | 47,510 1000 Int$ | +9.4% |
| 2016 | 36,217 1000 Int$ | -23.8% |
| 2017 | 41,770 1000 Int$ | +15.3% |
| 2018 | 34,445 1000 Int$ | -17.5% |
| 2019 | 33,321 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 2020 | 49,735 1000 Int$ | +49.3% |
| 2021 | 47,802 1000 Int$ | -3.9% |
| 2022 | 32,497 1000 Int$ | -32.0% |
| 2023 | 37,682 1000 Int$ | +16.0% |
| 2024 | 41,803 1000 Int$ | +10.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,302 1000 Int$ | 1,732 1000 Int$ | 2,701 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 4,473 1000 Int$ | 2,420 1000 Int$ | 5,762 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 14,069 1000 Int$ | 5,214 1000 Int$ | 23,407 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 24,425 1000 Int$ | 14,945 1000 Int$ | 39,613 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 37,816 1000 Int$ | 18,006 1000 Int$ | 55,818 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 40,846 1000 Int$ | 29,547 1000 Int$ | 54,129 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 41,904 1000 Int$ | 32,497 1000 Int$ | 49,735 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More agriculture & rural data for Uruguay
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 3.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0638 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,609 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0435 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 14.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural honey — gross production value in Uruguay?
- Natural honey — gross production value in Uruguay was 41,803 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest natural honey — gross production value recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 55,818 1000 Int$ in 2007.
- What is the lowest natural honey — gross production value recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,732 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Uruguay rank for natural honey — gross production value?
- Uruguay ranks 32nd out of 135 countries with data for 2024.
- Is natural honey — gross production value rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.