Natural honey — Gross Production Value in China
China: Natural honey — Gross Production Value was 1.64 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Natural honey — Gross Production Value in China, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
China recorded 1.64 million 1000 Int$ for natural honey — gross production value in 2024.
The figure is down 3.9% on the previous year and down 4.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural honey — gross production value in China peaked at 2.03 million 1000 Int$ in 2016 and was at its lowest, 191,829 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places China 1st out of 135 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value in China, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 191,829 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 198,985 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1963 | 209,662 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 1964 | 216,811 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1965 | 216,807 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 1966 | 234,773 1000 Int$ | +8.3% |
| 1967 | 235,479 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 1968 | 253,279 1000 Int$ | +7.6% |
| 1969 | 271,152 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1970 | 271,354 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1971 | 307,563 1000 Int$ | +13.3% |
| 1972 | 325,598 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1973 | 297,505 1000 Int$ | -8.6% |
| 1974 | 273,705 1000 Int$ | -8.0% |
| 1975 | 290,285 1000 Int$ | +6.1% |
| 1976 | 271,818 1000 Int$ | -6.4% |
| 1977 | 278,426 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 1978 | 271,213 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 1979 | 397,909 1000 Int$ | +46.7% |
| 1980 | 434,889 1000 Int$ | +9.3% |
| 1981 | 417,985 1000 Int$ | -3.9% |
| 1982 | 492,428 1000 Int$ | +17.8% |
| 1983 | 529,026 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1984 | 542,862 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1985 | 565,603 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1986 | 634,630 1000 Int$ | +12.2% |
| 1987 | 739,387 1000 Int$ | +16.5% |
| 1988 | 716,823 1000 Int$ | -3.1% |
| 1989 | 695,468 1000 Int$ | -3.0% |
| 1990 | 711,216 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1991 | 766,821 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 1992 | 659,640 1000 Int$ | -14.0% |
| 1993 | 651,429 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 1994 | 652,427 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 1995 | 655,733 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 1996 | 679,864 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1997 | 774,743 1000 Int$ | +14.0% |
| 1998 | 758,729 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1999 | 850,890 1000 Int$ | +12.1% |
| 2000 | 906,909 1000 Int$ | +6.6% |
| 2001 | 915,984 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2002 | 964,495 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 2003 | 1.06 million 1000 Int$ | +10.0% |
| 2004 | 1.07 million 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2005 | 1.08 million 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2006 | 1.22 million 1000 Int$ | +12.7% |
| 2007 | 1.29 million 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 2008 | 1.47 million 1000 Int$ | +14.0% |
| 2009 | 1.47 million 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.47 million 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 1.61 million 1000 Int$ | +9.0% |
| 2012 | 1.66 million 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 2013 | 1.66 million 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 2014 | 1.71 million 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 2015 | 1.75 million 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 2016 | 2.03 million 1000 Int$ | +16.1% |
| 2017 | 1.98 million 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 2018 | 1.65 million 1000 Int$ | -16.7% |
| 2019 | 1.61 million 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 2020 | 1.68 million 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 2021 | 1.75 million 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 2022 | 1.70 million 1000 Int$ | -3.0% |
| 2023 | 1.71 million 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2024 | 1.64 million 1000 Int$ | -3.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 225,420 1000 Int$ | 191,829 1000 Int$ | 271,152 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 298,538 1000 Int$ | 271,213 1000 Int$ | 397,909 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 576,910 1000 Int$ | 417,985 1000 Int$ | 739,387 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 716,149 1000 Int$ | 651,429 1000 Int$ | 850,890 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.14 million 1000 Int$ | 906,909 1000 Int$ | 1.47 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.71 million 1000 Int$ | 1.47 million 1000 Int$ | 2.03 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.70 million 1000 Int$ | 1.64 million 1000 Int$ | 1.75 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near China
More agriculture & rural data for China
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0666 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 923.03 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3366 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural honey — gross production value in China?
- Natural honey — gross production value in China was 1.64 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest natural honey — gross production value recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 2.03 million 1000 Int$ in 2016.
- What is the lowest natural honey — gross production value recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 191,829 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does China rank for natural honey — gross production value?
- China ranks 1st out of 135 countries with data for 2024.
- Is natural honey — gross production value rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.