Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Mexico
Mexico: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) was 0.1075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Mexico, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Mexico is 0.1075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 9.8% on the previous year and up 2.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Mexico peaked at 0.1382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1986 and was at its lowest, 0.0445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Mexico 50th out of 117 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Mexico, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0556 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0482 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 1965 | 0.0611 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1966 | 0.063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1968 | 0.0676 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +28.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0604 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0674 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0649 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1972 | 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 1973 | 0.091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0964 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1975 | 0.1032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1976 | 0.1034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1977 | 0.1051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1978 | 0.1081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1979 | 0.1139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1980 | 0.1209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1981 | 0.1307 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1982 | 0.0925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -29.2% |
| 1983 | 0.126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +36.2% |
| 1984 | 0.0871 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -30.9% |
| 1985 | 0.0773 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 1986 | 0.1382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +78.8% |
| 1987 | 0.1166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1988 | 0.1159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1989 | 0.1144 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1990 | 0.1232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1991 | 0.1287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1992 | 0.1183 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1993 | 0.1148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1994 | 0.1045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1995 | 0.0912 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 1996 | 0.0911 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1997 | 0.0994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1998 | 0.1024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1999 | 0.1025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.1092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2001 | 0.1094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2002 | 0.1091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2003 | 0.1057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2004 | 0.1054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2006 | 0.1037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2007 | 0.1027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2008 | 0.1106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2009 | 0.1039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2010 | 0.1032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2011 | 0.107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2012 | 0.1086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2013 | 0.1054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2014 | 0.1123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2015 | 0.1146 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2016 | 0.1026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2018 | 0.119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 2019 | 0.1148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2020 | 0.1003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 2021 | 0.115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2022 | 0.1192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2023 | 0.1075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
Mexico compared with similar countries
- Mexico's 0.1075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 1.4× the median. (38 countries reporting)
- Mexico's 0.1075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 2.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Mexico changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | +78.8% | 0.0773 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0569 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0676 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0936 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0649 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0773 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0911 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1192 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 47 Italy 0.1157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 48 Georgia 0.1088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 49 Nepal 0.1082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 51 Kenya 0.1063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 52 Trinidad and Tobago 0.1018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 53 Estonia 0.0981 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Mexico
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 0.4963 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0388 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 539.47 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5998 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1996 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Mexico?
- Natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Mexico was 0.1075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1986.
- What is the lowest natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Mexico rank for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
- Mexico ranks 50th out of 117 countries with data for 2023.
- Is natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Natural honey — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.