Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Haiti
Haiti: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) was 0.0409 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Haiti, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Haiti stood at 0.0409 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 3.5% on the previous year and down 26.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Haiti peaked at 0.1111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.0282 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
That places Haiti 72nd out of 117 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Haiti, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0457 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1964 | 0.034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 1965 | 0.0366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1966 | 0.0282 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 1967 | 0.031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1968 | 0.0313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1970 | 0.0319 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1971 | 0.0324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1972 | 0.0327 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1974 | 0.034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0353 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1977 | 0.0366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1978 | 0.0379 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1979 | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1980 | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0405 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1984 | 0.0522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1986 | 0.0601 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1987 | 0.0614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0653 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1990 | 0.0667 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1991 | 0.068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0706 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1993 | 0.0744 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1994 | 0.0789 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0838 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1996 | 0.0894 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0993 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1999 | 0.1029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2000 | 0.1058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2001 | 0.1069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2002 | 0.1085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2003 | 0.1111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2004 | 0.1086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2005 | 0.1032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2006 | 0.0935 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0731 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2010 | 0.0589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2011 | 0.0549 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2012 | 0.0555 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2013 | 0.0555 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0533 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2017 | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2018 | 0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2019 | 0.0448 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2020 | 0.0435 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0424 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2023 | 0.0409 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
Haiti compared with similar countries
- Haiti's 0.0409 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.0553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 74% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
- Haiti's 0.0409 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 77% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Haiti changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1964 | -25.7% | 0.0457 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1962 | -25.0% | 0.0522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0282 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0348 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0319 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0653 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0828 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0667 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0424 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0409 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0435 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Haiti
- 69 Kyrgyzstan 0.0553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 70 Tonga 0.0542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 71 Nicaragua 0.0506 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 73 Belarus 0.0387 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 74 New Caledonia 0.0385 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 75 Cameroon 0.0363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Haiti
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 26.66 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1581 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 425.88 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.1649 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4439 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 15.8% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 15.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.2% (2016)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.6% (2016)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Haiti?
- Natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Haiti was 0.0409 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Haiti?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- What is the lowest natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Haiti?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0282 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Haiti rank for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
- Haiti ranks 72nd out of 117 countries with data for 2023.
- Is natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) rising or falling in Haiti?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Haiti data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Natural honey — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.