Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Finland
Finland: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) was 0.0244 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Finland, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Finland recorded 0.0244 1000 Int$ per square kilometre for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in 2017.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 71.6% on the previous year and up 47.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Finland peaked at 0.036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
Finland ranks 80th of 117 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Finland, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 1967 | 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +210.4% |
| 1968 | 0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1969 | 0.0064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1971 | 0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1973 | 0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -33.4% |
| 1975 | 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1976 | 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1977 | 0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -33.4% |
| 1979 | 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1980 | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +144.4% |
| 1981 | 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 1982 | 0.0189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +77.8% |
| 1983 | 0.0148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 1984 | 0.0136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1985 | 0.0147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1986 | 0.0182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 1987 | 0.0144 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 1988 | 0.0206 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +43.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +40.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -37.2% |
| 1991 | 0.0193 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1992 | 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1993 | 0.0225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1995 | 0.0219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -45.9% |
| 1997 | 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +70.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -52.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2000 | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -31.3% |
| 2001 | 0.0213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +63.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2003 | 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +64.3% |
| 2006 | 0.036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -54.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2009 | 0.0178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -46.1% |
| 2013 | 0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +74.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 2015 | 0.0178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -42.3% |
| 2016 | 0.0142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0244 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +71.6% |
Finland compared with similar countries
- Finland's 0.0244 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.1351 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 18% of the median. (41 countries reporting)
- Finland's 0.0244 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.2008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 12% of the median. (41 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Finland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1967 | +210.4% | 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0168 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0206 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 77 Brazil 0.0276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 78 Japan 0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 79 Madagascar 0.0247 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 81 Myanmar 0.024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 82 Pakistan 0.0234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 83 Guinea-Bissau 0.0218 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Finland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0261 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,466 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5476 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2548 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 7.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Finland?
- Natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Finland was 0.0244 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Finland rank for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
- Finland ranks 80th out of 117 countries with data for 2017.
- Is natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 47.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Natural honey — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.