Molasses — Production, per square kilometre in Hungary
Hungary: Molasses — Production, per square kilometre was 0.3489 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.3489 t per square kilometre
Change on year
up 121.1%
World rank
47th
of 123 countries
All-time high
2.92 t per square kilometre
in 1991
All-time low
0.1578 t per square kilometre
in 2022
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Molasses — Production, per square kilometre in Hungary, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, molasses — production, per square kilometre in Hungary stood at 0.3489 t per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 121.1% on the previous year and up 12.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, molasses — production, per square kilometre in Hungary peaked at 2.92 t per square kilometre in 1991 and was at its lowest, 0.1578 t per square kilometre, in 2022.
Hungary ranks 47th of 123 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Molasses — Production, per square kilometre in Hungary, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.24 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.61 t per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 1963 | 1.19 t per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 1964 | 1.42 t per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 1965 | 1.93 t per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1966 | 1.78 t per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1967 | 1.86 t per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1968 | 1.71 t per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1969 | 1.89 t per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1970 | 1.5 t per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 1971 | 1.23 t per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 1972 | 1.57 t per square kilometre | +27.5% |
| 1973 | 1.84 t per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1974 | 1.73 t per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1975 | 2.43 t per square kilometre | +40.6% |
| 1976 | 2.41 t per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1977 | 2.47 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1978 | 2.54 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1979 | 2.71 t per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1980 | 2.23 t per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 1981 | 2.38 t per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1982 | 2.69 t per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1983 | 2.72 t per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1984 | 2.04 t per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 1985 | 2.43 t per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1986 | 2.15 t per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1987 | 2.25 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1988 | 2.27 t per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1989 | 2.67 t per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1990 | 2.36 t per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 1991 | 2.92 t per square kilometre | +23.9% |
| 1992 | 1.96 t per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 1993 | 1.46 t per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 1994 | 1.96 t per square kilometre | +34.5% |
| 1995 | 2.1 t per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1996 | 2.3 t per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1997 | 2 t per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1998 | 1.69 t per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 1999 | 1.41 t per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 2000 | 0.9819 t per square kilometre | -30.6% |
| 2001 | 1.41 t per square kilometre | +43.2% |
| 2002 | 1.05 t per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 2003 | 0.8145 t per square kilometre | -22.3% |
| 2004 | 1.48 t per square kilometre | +82.2% |
| 2005 | 1.27 t per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.8928 t per square kilometre | -29.8% |
| 2007 | 0.6361 t per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 2008 | 0.1674 t per square kilometre | -73.7% |
| 2009 | 0.2872 t per square kilometre | +71.6% |
| 2010 | 0.2872 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.2872 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.2762 t per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2013 | 0.3093 t per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2014 | 0.3068 t per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2015 | 0.3068 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.3835 t per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2017 | 0.3835 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.3068 t per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 2019 | 0.3068 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.2959 t per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2021 | 0.2306 t per square kilometre | -22.1% |
| 2022 | 0.1578 t per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 2023 | 0.3489 t per square kilometre | +121.1% |
Hungary compared with similar countries
- Hungary's 0.3489 t per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.1626 t per square kilometre, 2.1× the median. (37 countries reporting)
- Hungary's 0.3489 t per square kilometre is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.1482 t per square kilometre, 2.4× the median. (36 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.63 t per square kilometre | 1.19 t per square kilometre | 1.93 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.04 t per square kilometre | 1.23 t per square kilometre | 2.71 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.38 t per square kilometre | 2.04 t per square kilometre | 2.72 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.02 t per square kilometre | 1.41 t per square kilometre | 2.92 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8991 t per square kilometre | 0.1674 t per square kilometre | 1.48 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3154 t per square kilometre | 0.2762 t per square kilometre | 0.3835 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2583 t per square kilometre | 0.1578 t per square kilometre | 0.3489 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Hungary
More agriculture & rural data for Hungary
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8.23 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0265 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 687.58 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2931 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is molasses — production, per square kilometre in Hungary?
- Molasses — production, per square kilometre in Hungary was 0.3489 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest molasses — production, per square kilometre recorded in Hungary?
- The highest recorded value was 2.92 t per square kilometre in 1991.
- What is the lowest molasses — production, per square kilometre recorded in Hungary?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1578 t per square kilometre in 2022.
- How does Hungary rank for molasses — production, per square kilometre?
- Hungary ranks 47th out of 123 countries with data for 2023.
- Is molasses — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Hungary?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hungary data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Molasses — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Molasses — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Molasses — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Molasses — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Molasses — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.