Millet and products — Feed in Namibia

Namibia: Millet and products — Feed was 0 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
Change on year
down 100.0%
World rank
72nd
of 151 countries
All-time high
3 1000 t
in 2013
All-time low
0 1000 t
in 2010
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Millet and products — Feed in Namibia, 2010–2023

01232010201620232010: 0 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 3 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 2 1000 t2017: 2 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: 1 1000 t2020: 2 1000 t2021: 1 1000 t2022: 1 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2023, millet and products — feed in Namibia stood at 0 1000 t. That is the lowest value across all 14 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, millet and products — feed in Namibia peaked at 3 1000 t in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.

That places Namibia 72nd out of 151 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0.8 1000 t 0 1000 t 3 1000 t 10
2020s 1 1000 t 0 1000 t 2 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Namibia

  1. 72 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
  2. 72 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  3. 72 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  4. 72 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  5. 72 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  6. 72 Afghanistan 0 1000 t compare
  7. 72 Gambia 0 1000 t compare
  8. 72 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  9. 72 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  10. 72 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t compare
  11. 72 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  12. 72 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  13. 72 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  14. 72 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  15. 72 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  16. 72 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  17. 72 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  18. 72 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  19. 72 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  20. 72 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
  21. 72 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  22. 72 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  23. 72 Mauritania 0 1000 t compare
  24. 72 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  25. 72 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  26. 72 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  27. 72 Côte d'Ivoire 0 1000 t compare
  28. 72 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  29. 72 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  30. 72 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
  31. 72 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  32. 72 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  33. 72 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  34. 72 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  35. 72 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  36. 72 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  37. 72 Armenia 0 1000 t compare
  38. 72 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  39. 72 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  40. 72 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  41. 72 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  42. 72 Mozambique 0 1000 t compare
  43. 72 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  44. 72 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  45. 72 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  46. 72 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  47. 72 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  48. 72 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  49. 72 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  50. 72 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  51. 72 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  52. 72 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  53. 72 Croatia 0 1000 t compare
  54. 72 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  55. 72 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  56. 72 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  57. 72 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  58. 72 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  59. 72 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  60. 72 Tajikistan 0 1000 t compare
  61. 72 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
  62. 72 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  63. 72 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  64. 72 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  65. 72 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
  66. 72 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  67. 72 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  68. 72 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  69. 72 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
  70. 72 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  71. 72 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  72. 72 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  73. 72 Egypt 0 1000 t compare
  74. 72 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  75. 72 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  76. 72 Slovakia 0 1000 t compare
  77. 72 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare
  78. 72 Caribbean 0 1000 t compare
  79. 72 Romania 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 182 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Namibia

All data for Namibia →

Frequently asked questions

What is millet and products — feed in Namibia?
Millet and products — feed in Namibia was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest millet and products — feed recorded in Namibia?
The highest recorded value was 3 1000 t in 2013.
What is the lowest millet and products — feed recorded in Namibia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
How does Namibia rank for millet and products — feed?
Namibia ranks 72nd out of 151 countries with data for 2023.
Is millet and products — feed rising or falling in Namibia?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Namibia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Millet and products — Feed. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Millet and products — Feed
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
182 places, 2,350 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.