Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Bangladesh
Bangladesh: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross was 6.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Bangladesh, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Bangladesh is 6.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.9% on the previous year and up 6.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Bangladesh peaked at 6.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Bangladesh ranks 25th of 167 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Bangladesh, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 3.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1963 | 4.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1964 | 4.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1965 | 4.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 4.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1967 | 4.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1968 | 4.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1969 | 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1970 | 4.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1971 | 4.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1972 | 4.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 4.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1974 | 4.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1975 | 4.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1976 | 4.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1977 | 4.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1978 | 5.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1979 | 5.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1980 | 4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -32.1% |
| 1981 | 4.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1982 | 4.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1983 | 4.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1984 | 4.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1985 | 4.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1986 | 4.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1987 | 4.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1988 | 4.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1989 | 4.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1990 | 4.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1991 | 4.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1992 | 4.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1993 | 4.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1994 | 4.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1995 | 4.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1996 | 5.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1997 | 5.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1998 | 5.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1999 | 5.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2000 | 5.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2001 | 5.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2002 | 5.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2003 | 5.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2004 | 5.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2005 | 6.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2006 | 6.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2007 | 6.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 6.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2009 | 6.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2010 | 6.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2011 | 6.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2012 | 6.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2013 | 6.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2014 | 6.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 6.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2016 | 6.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2017 | 6.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2018 | 6.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2019 | 6.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2020 | 6.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2021 | 6.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2022 | 6.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2023 | 6.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
Bangladesh compared with similar countries
- Bangladesh's 6.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 4.8× the median. (40 countries reporting)
- Bangladesh's 6.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for South Asia, which is 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 5.1× the median. (5 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Bangladesh changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980 | -32.1% | 5.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 5.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 5.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 5.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 6.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 6.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 6.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 6.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 6.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bangladesh
- 22 Azerbaijan 7.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Costa Rica 7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Rwanda 6.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Pakistan 6.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Italy 6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Japan 5.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Bangladesh
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 3.73 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1142 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 296.72 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.38 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6676 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 11.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 11.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.8% (2018)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 6.0% (2018)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Bangladesh?
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Bangladesh was 6.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Bangladesh?
- The highest recorded value was 6.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Bangladesh?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Bangladesh rank for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Bangladesh ranks 25th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross rising or falling in Bangladesh?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bangladesh data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.