Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Rwanda

Rwanda: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita was 6.43 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
6.43 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
up 4.9%
World rank
186th
of 191 countries
All-time high
9.6 kilograms per year per capita
in 2015
All-time low
3.6 kilograms per year per capita
in 1965
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Rwanda, 1961–2023

0246810196119922023

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

Rwanda recorded 6.43 kilograms per year per capita for meat supply vs. gdp per capita in 2023.

That represents a change of up 4.9% on the previous year and down 20.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Rwanda peaked at 9.6 kilograms per year per capita in 2015 and was at its lowest, 3.6 kilograms per year per capita, in 1965.

Rwanda ranks 186th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 3.82 kilograms per year per capita 3.6 kilograms per year per capita 4.1 kilograms per year per capita 9
1970s 4.22 kilograms per year per capita 3.72 kilograms per year per capita 4.79 kilograms per year per capita 10
1980s 4.55 kilograms per year per capita 4.11 kilograms per year per capita 5.03 kilograms per year per capita 10
1990s 4.09 kilograms per year per capita 3.69 kilograms per year per capita 4.62 kilograms per year per capita 10
2000s 5.75 kilograms per year per capita 4.53 kilograms per year per capita 6.68 kilograms per year per capita 10
2010s 8.53 kilograms per year per capita 7.77 kilograms per year per capita 9.6 kilograms per year per capita 10
2020s 6.97 kilograms per year per capita 6.13 kilograms per year per capita 8.36 kilograms per year per capita 4

Countries ranked near Rwanda

  1. 183 Mali 7.5 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 184 Nigeria 7.11 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 185 Ethiopia 6.91 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 187 Afghanistan 6.39 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 188 Madagascar 5.34 kilograms per year per capita compare
  6. 189 Bangladesh 4.49 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Rwanda

All data for Rwanda →

Frequently asked questions

What is meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Rwanda?
Meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Rwanda was 6.43 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Rwanda?
The highest recorded value was 9.6 kilograms per year per capita in 2015.
What is the lowest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Rwanda?
The lowest recorded value was 3.6 kilograms per year per capita in 1965.
How does Rwanda rank for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
Rwanda ranks 186th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
Is meat supply vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Rwanda?
Over the last ten years it is down 20.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Rwanda data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.