Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Mongolia
Mongolia: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita was 136.14 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. βΌ Falling
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Mongolia, 1961β2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.
Analysis
In 2023, meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Mongolia stood at 136.14 kilograms per year per capita.
The figure is up 3.5% on the previous year and up 65.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Mongolia peaked at 141.22 kilograms per year per capita in 1961 and was at its lowest, 65.82 kilograms per year per capita, in 2006.
That places Mongolia 2nd out of 191 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 125.4 kilograms per year per capita | 118.74 kilograms per year per capita | 141.22 kilograms per year per capita | 9 |
| 1970s | 114.26 kilograms per year per capita | 107.78 kilograms per year per capita | 121.35 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 1980s | 102.46 kilograms per year per capita | 94.48 kilograms per year per capita | 111.4 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 1990s | 101.27 kilograms per year per capita | 87.81 kilograms per year per capita | 118.51 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2000s | 77.27 kilograms per year per capita | 65.82 kilograms per year per capita | 98.29 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2010s | 84.21 kilograms per year per capita | 68.18 kilograms per year per capita | 110.85 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2020s | 127.47 kilograms per year per capita | 120.41 kilograms per year per capita | 136.14 kilograms per year per capita | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mongolia
- 1 Tonga 156.93 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 3 Marshall Islands 125.62 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 4 United States 122.06 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 5 Macao 121.23 kilograms per year per capita compare
More agriculture & rural data for Mongolia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 2.27 billion current US$ (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 8.9% (2025)
- Rural population 1.03 million (2025)
- Rural population growth 0.6% (2025)
- Rural population 28.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.7% (2023)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 8.9% (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 8.9% (2025)
- Land under cereal production 363,061 hectares (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Mongolia?
- Meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Mongolia was 136.14 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was 141.22 kilograms per year per capita in 1961.
- What is the lowest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was 65.82 kilograms per year per capita in 2006.
- How does Mongolia rank for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
- Mongolia ranks 2nd out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat supply vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Mongolia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 65.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.