Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Malta

Malta: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita was 71.76 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
71.76 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
up 3.7%
Rank
60th
of 191 regions
All-time high
94.74 kilograms per year per capita
in 2014
All-time low
28.01 kilograms per year per capita
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Malta, 1961–2023

20406080100196119922023

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

In 2023, meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Malta stood at 71.76 kilograms per year per capita.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.7% on the previous year and down 11.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Malta peaked at 94.74 kilograms per year per capita in 2014 and was at its lowest, 28.01 kilograms per year per capita, in 1962.

That places Malta 60th out of 191 regions with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 33.76 kilograms per year per capita 28.01 kilograms per year per capita 42.81 kilograms per year per capita 9
1970s 48.3 kilograms per year per capita 41.65 kilograms per year per capita 57.64 kilograms per year per capita 10
1980s 59.08 kilograms per year per capita 52.88 kilograms per year per capita 67.45 kilograms per year per capita 10
1990s 74.04 kilograms per year per capita 62.53 kilograms per year per capita 80.98 kilograms per year per capita 10
2000s 81.59 kilograms per year per capita 74.8 kilograms per year per capita 91.32 kilograms per year per capita 10
2010s 79.14 kilograms per year per capita 66.15 kilograms per year per capita 94.74 kilograms per year per capita 10
2020s 70.89 kilograms per year per capita 68.46 kilograms per year per capita 74.18 kilograms per year per capita 4

Countries ranked near Malta

  1. 57 Austria 73.71 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 58 China 73.54 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 59 Romania 72.45 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 61 Netherlands 71.58 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 62 Qatar 71.43 kilograms per year per capita compare
  6. 63 Italy 71.2 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Malta

All data for Malta →

Frequently asked questions

What is meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Malta?
Meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Malta was 71.76 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Malta?
The highest recorded value was 94.74 kilograms per year per capita in 2014.
What is the lowest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Malta?
The lowest recorded value was 28.01 kilograms per year per capita in 1962.
How does Malta rank for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
Malta ranks 60th out of 191 regions with data for 2023.
Is meat supply vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Malta?
Over the last ten years it is down 11.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Malta data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.