Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Canada

Canada: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita was 94.79 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
94.79 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
up 4.4%
World rank
28th
of 191 countries
All-time high
101.44 kilograms per year per capita
in 1999
All-time low
78.66 kilograms per year per capita
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Canada, 1961–2023

0255075100196119922023

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

Canada recorded 94.79 kilograms per year per capita for meat supply vs. gdp per capita in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.4% on the previous year and up 5.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Canada peaked at 101.44 kilograms per year per capita in 1999 and was at its lowest, 78.66 kilograms per year per capita, in 1962.

Canada ranks 28th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 85.75 kilograms per year per capita 78.66 kilograms per year per capita 91.53 kilograms per year per capita 9
1970s 96.16 kilograms per year per capita 93.85 kilograms per year per capita 100.46 kilograms per year per capita 10
1980s 95.49 kilograms per year per capita 93.61 kilograms per year per capita 97.68 kilograms per year per capita 10
1990s 93.52 kilograms per year per capita 90.51 kilograms per year per capita 101.44 kilograms per year per capita 10
2000s 97.72 kilograms per year per capita 94.08 kilograms per year per capita 100.63 kilograms per year per capita 10
2010s 91.33 kilograms per year per capita 89.56 kilograms per year per capita 92.84 kilograms per year per capita 10
2020s 91.18 kilograms per year per capita 88.28 kilograms per year per capita 94.79 kilograms per year per capita 4

Countries ranked near Canada

  1. 25 Montenegro 96.86 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 26 Netherlands Antilles 96.56 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 27 Antigua and Barbuda 96.36 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 29 Taiwan 91.5 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 30 Saint Lucia 90.32 kilograms per year per capita compare
  6. 31 New Caledonia 89.59 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Canada

All data for Canada →

Frequently asked questions

What is meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Canada?
Meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Canada was 94.79 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Canada?
The highest recorded value was 101.44 kilograms per year per capita in 1999.
What is the lowest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Canada?
The lowest recorded value was 78.66 kilograms per year per capita in 1962.
How does Canada rank for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
Canada ranks 28th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
Is meat supply vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Canada?
Over the last ten years it is up 5.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Canada data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.