Livestock — Gross Production Value in China, Hong Kong SAR
China, Hong Kong SAR: Livestock — Gross Production Value was 2.74 million 1000 SLC in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
2.74 million 1000 SLC
Change on year
up 0.6%
World rank
102nd
of 145 countries
All-time high
4.46 million 1000 SLC
in 2020
All-time low
510,616 1000 SLC
in 1994
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Livestock — Gross Production Value in China, Hong Kong SAR, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.
Analysis
The most recent figure for livestock — gross production value in China, Hong Kong SAR is 2.74 million 1000 SLC, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.6% on the previous year and up 56.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, livestock — gross production value in China, Hong Kong SAR peaked at 4.46 million 1000 SLC in 2020 and was at its lowest, 510,616 1000 SLC, in 1994.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 102nd of 145 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Livestock — Gross Production Value in China, Hong Kong SAR, year by year
| Year | 1000 SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 2.18 million 1000 SLC | — |
| 1962 | 2.97 million 1000 SLC | +36.2% |
| 1963 | 2.76 million 1000 SLC | -7.1% |
| 1964 | 2.18 million 1000 SLC | -21.0% |
| 1965 | 2.01 million 1000 SLC | -8.0% |
| 1966 | 1.80 million 1000 SLC | -10.4% |
| 1967 | 1.96 million 1000 SLC | +8.9% |
| 1968 | 2.53 million 1000 SLC | +29.0% |
| 1969 | 2.65 million 1000 SLC | +4.7% |
| 1970 | 2.80 million 1000 SLC | +5.8% |
| 1971 | 2.99 million 1000 SLC | +6.8% |
| 1972 | 3.34 million 1000 SLC | +11.5% |
| 1973 | 2.61 million 1000 SLC | -21.7% |
| 1974 | 2.42 million 1000 SLC | -7.5% |
| 1975 | 2.22 million 1000 SLC | -8.2% |
| 1976 | 2.40 million 1000 SLC | +8.2% |
| 1977 | 2.91 million 1000 SLC | +21.2% |
| 1978 | 3.10 million 1000 SLC | +6.6% |
| 1979 | 3.44 million 1000 SLC | +10.8% |
| 1980 | 1.88 million 1000 SLC | -45.3% |
| 1981 | 3.85 million 1000 SLC | +104.6% |
| 1982 | 3.71 million 1000 SLC | -3.6% |
| 1983 | 3.65 million 1000 SLC | -1.6% |
| 1984 | 3.33 million 1000 SLC | -8.8% |
| 1985 | 3.68 million 1000 SLC | +10.6% |
| 1986 | 3.26 million 1000 SLC | -11.6% |
| 1987 | 3.40 million 1000 SLC | +4.5% |
| 1988 | 3.49 million 1000 SLC | +2.5% |
| 1989 | 3.01 million 1000 SLC | -13.7% |
| 1990 | 2.60 million 1000 SLC | -13.6% |
| 1991 | 2.16 million 1000 SLC | -17.0% |
| 1992 | 1.24 million 1000 SLC | -42.7% |
| 1993 | 1.51 million 1000 SLC | +22.0% |
| 1994 | 510,616 1000 SLC | -66.2% |
| 1995 | 761,990 1000 SLC | +49.2% |
| 1996 | 870,500 1000 SLC | +14.2% |
| 1997 | 965,889 1000 SLC | +11.0% |
| 1998 | 1.12 million 1000 SLC | +15.8% |
| 1999 | 1.38 million 1000 SLC | +23.3% |
| 2000 | 1.47 million 1000 SLC | +6.5% |
| 2001 | 1.53 million 1000 SLC | +4.0% |
| 2002 | 1.34 million 1000 SLC | -12.2% |
| 2003 | 1.83 million 1000 SLC | +36.1% |
| 2004 | 1.58 million 1000 SLC | -13.5% |
| 2005 | 1.71 million 1000 SLC | +7.9% |
| 2006 | 1.75 million 1000 SLC | +2.4% |
| 2007 | 1.98 million 1000 SLC | +13.2% |
| 2008 | 1.73 million 1000 SLC | -12.3% |
| 2009 | 2.20 million 1000 SLC | +26.7% |
| 2010 | 1.80 million 1000 SLC | -18.0% |
| 2011 | 1.53 million 1000 SLC | -14.8% |
| 2012 | 1.61 million 1000 SLC | +5.0% |
| 2013 | 1.91 million 1000 SLC | +18.2% |
| 2014 | 1.76 million 1000 SLC | -7.9% |
| 2015 | 1.75 million 1000 SLC | -0.1% |
| 2016 | 1.91 million 1000 SLC | +8.9% |
| 2017 | 1.76 million 1000 SLC | -7.6% |
| 2018 | 1.67 million 1000 SLC | -5.4% |
| 2019 | 3.83 million 1000 SLC | +129.4% |
| 2020 | 4.46 million 1000 SLC | +16.7% |
| 2021 | 3.14 million 1000 SLC | -29.7% |
| 2022 | 3.28 million 1000 SLC | +4.4% |
| 2023 | 2.72 million 1000 SLC | -16.9% |
| 2024 | 2.74 million 1000 SLC | +0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.34 million 1000 SLC | 1.80 million 1000 SLC | 2.97 million 1000 SLC | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.82 million 1000 SLC | 2.22 million 1000 SLC | 3.44 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.32 million 1000 SLC | 1.88 million 1000 SLC | 3.85 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.31 million 1000 SLC | 510,616 1000 SLC | 2.60 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.71 million 1000 SLC | 1.34 million 1000 SLC | 2.20 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.95 million 1000 SLC | 1.53 million 1000 SLC | 3.83 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.27 million 1000 SLC | 2.72 million 1000 SLC | 4.46 million 1000 SLC | 5 |
Countries ranked near China, Hong Kong SAR
More agriculture & rural data for China, Hong Kong SAR
- Fat of pigs — Production, annual growth rate -5.42 % change on previous year (2024)
- Vegetables Primary — Production, annual growth rate 0.0853 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate 0.1332 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Yield, annual growth rate -0.1528 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Production, annual growth rate 0.4504 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual -5.42 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing 1.66 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Swine / pigs — Stocks, annual growth rate 1.9 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is livestock — gross production value in China, Hong Kong SAR?
- Livestock — gross production value in China, Hong Kong SAR was 2.74 million 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest livestock — gross production value recorded in China, Hong Kong SAR?
- The highest recorded value was 4.46 million 1000 SLC in 2020.
- What is the lowest livestock — gross production value recorded in China, Hong Kong SAR?
- The lowest recorded value was 510,616 1000 SLC in 1994.
- How does China, Hong Kong SAR rank for livestock — gross production value?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 102nd out of 145 countries with data for 2024.
- Is livestock — gross production value rising or falling in China, Hong Kong SAR?
- Over the last ten years it is up 56.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this China, Hong Kong SAR data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.