Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in United States
United States: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in United States, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in United States is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 64 years on record.
The figure is down 7.6% on the previous year and down 43.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in United States peaked at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
United States ranks 123rd of 178 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in United States, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1967 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 1972 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.7% |
| 1973 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 1974 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 1975 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 1976 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1977 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1978 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1979 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 1980 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 1981 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 1982 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 1983 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -29.1% |
| 1984 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +10.3% |
| 1985 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1986 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1987 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.7% |
| 1988 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1989 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 1990 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 1991 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 1992 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 1993 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 1994 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.0% |
| 1995 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1996 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 1997 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 1998 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1999 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 2000 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +11.8% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.4% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 2024 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
United States compared with similar countries
- United States's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 2.0× the median. (57 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near United States
More agriculture & rural data for United States
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 11.96 % change on previous year (2021)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0094 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 673.66 current US$ per person (2021)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.1831 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1981 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.9% (2021)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.9% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in United States?
- Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in United States was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in United States?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in United States?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does United States rank for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
- United States ranks 123rd out of 178 countries with data for 2024.
- Is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp rising or falling in United States?
- Over the last ten years it is down 43.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this United States data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Land under cereal production (hectares) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Land under cereal production FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.