Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in United Kingdom
United Kingdom: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in United Kingdom, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
United Kingdom recorded 0 hectares per US$ of GDP for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of down 9.0% on the previous year and down 16.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in United Kingdom peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1962 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
United Kingdom ranks 136th of 178 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in United Kingdom, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 1963 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1964 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 1965 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 1966 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 1967 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1968 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.6% |
| 1969 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 1970 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 1971 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 1972 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 1973 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1974 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 1975 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 1976 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.8% |
| 1977 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1978 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.3% |
| 1979 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -22.4% |
| 1980 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -21.0% |
| 1981 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +5.5% |
| 1982 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.3% |
| 1983 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 1984 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +8.1% |
| 1985 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 1986 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -18.5% |
| 1987 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -21.1% |
| 1988 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -18.9% |
| 1989 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1990 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -20.0% |
| 1991 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1992 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 1993 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1994 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 1995 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 1996 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 1997 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 1998 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 1999 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 2000 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +8.0% |
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -18.2% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +19.6% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +13.9% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.1% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +9.8% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.2% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
United Kingdom compared with similar countries
- United Kingdom's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 1.0× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- United Kingdom's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 18% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near United Kingdom
More agriculture & rural data for United Kingdom
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8.26 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0064 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 368.63 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.1852 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1668 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in United Kingdom?
- Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in United Kingdom was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in United Kingdom?
- The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1962.
- What is the lowest land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in United Kingdom?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does United Kingdom rank for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
- United Kingdom ranks 136th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp rising or falling in United Kingdom?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this United Kingdom data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Land under cereal production (hectares) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Land under cereal production FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.