How does Suriname rank for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?

Suriname ranks 75th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.

Is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Suriname?

Over the last ten years it is up 26.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in Suriname

Name: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in Suriname
Creator: Statizoid (derived)
License: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page

Suriname: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

Change on year

up 11.1%

World rank

75th

of 178 countries

All-time high

0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 1961

All-time low

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2012

Years of data

1961–2023

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in Suriname, 1961–2023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

In 2023, land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in Suriname stood at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That represents a change of up 11.1% on the previous year and up 26.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in Suriname peaked at 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2012.

Suriname ranks 75th of 178 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in Suriname, year by year

Annual values for Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in Suriname, 1961 to 2023.
Year	hectares per US$ of GDP	Change
1961	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	—
1962	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	-2.4%
1963	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	-7.1%
1964	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	+3.7%
1965	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	-4.6%
1966	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	-29.1%
1967	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	-1.0%
1968	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-4.4%
1969	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-14.6%
1970	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+13.5%
1971	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-6.3%
1972	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-10.0%
1973	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+10.5%
1974	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-18.4%
1975	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-5.7%
1976	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-6.3%
1977	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-19.1%
1978	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-3.1%
1979	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+0.2%
1980	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+8.6%
1981	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-2.5%
1982	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-0.5%
1983	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+4.6%
1984	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+4.4%
1985	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-1.0%
1986	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-1.7%
1987	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-13.9%
1988	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-17.5%
1989	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+114.9%
1990	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+4.1%
1991	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+0.0%
1992	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	+26.7%
1993	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-19.4%
1994	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-27.5%
1995	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-10.5%
1996	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-19.3%
1997	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	-19.5%
1998	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-21.9%
1999	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+21.1%
2000	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-19.0%
2001	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	+37.4%
2002	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-39.8%
2003	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	+12.3%
2004	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-19.7%
2005	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-23.1%
2006	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-33.7%
2007	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-14.9%
2008	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-13.8%
2009	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	+13.8%
2010	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-12.8%
2011	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	+5.0%
2012	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-19.9%
2013	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	+9.8%
2014	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	+4.8%
2015	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-2.6%
2016	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	+63.6%
2017	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-12.7%
2018	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-14.8%
2019	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	+6.5%
2020	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	+32.5%
2021	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-7.9%
2022	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	-29.4%
2023	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	+11.1%

Suriname compared with similar countries

Suriname's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 2.0× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Suriname's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 3.2× the median. (32 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in Suriname changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

Year	Change	From	To
1989	+114.9%	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
1960s	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	9
1970s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	10
1980s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	10
1990s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	10
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	10
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	10
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	4

Countries ranked near Suriname

72 Eswatini 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
73 Romania 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
74 Sri Lanka 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
76 Uzbekistan 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
77 Belize 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
78 Azerbaijan 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 225 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Suriname

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 20.23 % change on previous year (2024)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0677 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 471.32 current US$ per person (2024)
Rural population, annual growth rate 0.7818 % change on previous year (2025)
Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Rural population, per capita 0.3421 units per person (2025)
Share of GDP from agriculture 6.8% (2024)
Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.8% (2024)
Agricultural raw materials exports 6.0% (2024)
Agricultural raw materials imports 0.1% (2024)

All data for Suriname →

Frequently asked questions

What is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in Suriname?: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in Suriname was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in Suriname?: The highest recorded value was 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961.
What is the lowest land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in Suriname?: The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2012.
How does Suriname rank for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?: Suriname ranks 75th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
Is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Suriname?: Over the last ten years it is up 26.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Suriname data come from?: The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in Suriname. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/suriname/">Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in Suriname</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Land under cereal production (hectares) ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Land under cereal production FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.