Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in OECD members
OECD members: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in OECD members, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in OECD members is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 64 years on record.
The figure is down 35.5% on the previous year and down 52.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in OECD members peaked at 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
OECD members ranks 36th of 47 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in OECD members, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1965 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 1973 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.9% |
| 1974 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 1975 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 1976 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1977 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 1978 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -18.6% |
| 1979 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 1980 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1981 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 1982 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 1983 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 1984 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 1985 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1986 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -21.1% |
| 1987 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -18.6% |
| 1988 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 1989 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 1990 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 1991 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 1992 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1993 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 1994 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1995 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 1996 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 1997 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 1998 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 1999 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 2000 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.2% |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.4% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.2% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +5.4% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.7% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.6% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 2024 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -35.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 33 Kazakhstan 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 34 Uganda 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 35 Liberia 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 36 Zimbabwe 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 37 Pakistan 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 38 Cameroon 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 39 Kyrgyzstan 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
More agriculture & rural data for OECD members
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.1% (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 977.64 billion current US$ (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 1.4% (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 3.99 % change on previous year (2024)
- Rural population 262.00 million (2025)
- Rural population growth -0.3% (2025)
- Rural population 18.7% (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0143 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 699.9 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.3033 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in OECD members?
- Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in OECD members was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does OECD members rank for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
- OECD members ranks 36th out of 47 groups with data for 2024.
- Is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is down 52.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Land under cereal production (hectares) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Land under cereal production FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.