Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in New Zealand
New Zealand: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in New Zealand, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
New Zealand recorded 0 hectares per US$ of GDP for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.2% on the previous year and down 31.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in New Zealand peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1968 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2021.
That places New Zealand 143rd out of 178 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP in New Zealand, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1963 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 1964 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 1965 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +22.9% |
| 1966 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 1967 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +5.0% |
| 1968 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +67.5% |
| 1969 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1970 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.9% |
| 1971 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 1972 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1973 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -32.9% |
| 1974 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.2% |
| 1975 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +15.9% |
| 1976 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.4% |
| 1977 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.3% |
| 1978 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -21.6% |
| 1979 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 1980 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 1981 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 1982 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +8.7% |
| 1983 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 1984 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +35.7% |
| 1985 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 1986 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 1987 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -36.2% |
| 1988 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -33.6% |
| 1989 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 1990 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.2% |
| 1991 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1992 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 1993 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1994 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
| 1995 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -23.2% |
| 1996 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.7% |
| 1997 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +12.8% |
| 1998 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 1999 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 2000 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.9% |
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.9% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -32.5% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -25.0% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +18.9% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +31.8% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -31.0% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +14.9% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -22.6% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.9% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.2% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 2024 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.2% |
New Zealand compared with similar countries
- New Zealand's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 51% of the median. (57 countries reporting)
- New Zealand's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 30% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near New Zealand
More agriculture & rural data for New Zealand
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -10.07 % change on previous year (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,976 current US$ per person (2023)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.275 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.16 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2023)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in New Zealand?
- Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp in New Zealand was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1968.
- What is the lowest land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2021.
- How does New Zealand rank for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
- New Zealand ranks 143rd out of 178 countries with data for 2024.
- Is land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp rising or falling in New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Land under cereal production (hectares) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Land under cereal production FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.