Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP was 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in sq. km per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) is 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.5% on the previous year and down 37.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 0.0007 sq. km per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 2nd of 47 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | sq. km per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0007 sq. km per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0007 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0006 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 1964 | 0.0006 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +7.5% |
| 1965 | 0.0005 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0005 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1967 | 0.0005 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0005 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 1969 | 0.0004 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 1970 | 0.0004 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +3.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0004 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 1972 | 0.0004 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0003 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -18.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0003 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 1975 | 0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 1976 | 0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 1977 | 0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 1978 | 0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -9.7% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +8.7% |
| 1987 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1991 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 1992 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +31.5% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +16.9% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 2007 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
| 2008 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -16.0% |
| 2009 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +1.4% |
| 2010 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 2011 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 2012 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +6.6% |
| 2013 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 2014 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2015 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | +4.6% |
| 2016 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 2017 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 2018 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 2019 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 2020 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 2021 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 2022 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 2023 | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0006 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0003 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 1 Central African Republic 0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP compare
- 2 Greenland 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP compare
- 3 Mauritania 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP compare
- 4 Mongolia 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP compare
- 5 Niger 0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP compare
More agriculture & rural data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 272.81 billion current US$ (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 21.2% (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.12 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population 595.18 million (2025)
- Rural population growth 1.8% (2025)
- Rural population 61.7% (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2122 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 282.66 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.86 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0007 sq. km per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 2nd out of 47 groups with data for 2023.
- Is land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 37.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Land area (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Land area (sq. km) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Land area (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.