Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross was 8,474 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
8,474 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.1%
Rank
9th
of 19 groups
All-time high
11,230 1000 Int$
in 1969
All-time low
3,846 1000 Int$
in 1977
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) is 8,474 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.1% on the previous year and up 2.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 11,230 1000 Int$ in 1969 and was at its lowest, 3,846 1000 Int$, in 1977.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 8,787 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 6,573 1000 Int$ | -25.2% |
| 1963 | 7,368 1000 Int$ | +12.1% |
| 1964 | 6,007 1000 Int$ | -18.5% |
| 1965 | 7,805 1000 Int$ | +29.9% |
| 1966 | 7,932 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1967 | 8,455 1000 Int$ | +6.6% |
| 1968 | 9,940 1000 Int$ | +17.6% |
| 1969 | 11,230 1000 Int$ | +13.0% |
| 1970 | 10,304 1000 Int$ | -8.2% |
| 1971 | 7,960 1000 Int$ | -22.7% |
| 1972 | 6,923 1000 Int$ | -13.0% |
| 1973 | 6,550 1000 Int$ | -5.4% |
| 1974 | 5,873 1000 Int$ | -10.3% |
| 1975 | 6,127 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1976 | 4,301 1000 Int$ | -29.8% |
| 1977 | 3,846 1000 Int$ | -10.6% |
| 1978 | 4,418 1000 Int$ | +14.9% |
| 1979 | 4,420 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 4,244 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 1981 | 4,477 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 1982 | 4,981 1000 Int$ | +11.3% |
| 1983 | 5,367 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 1984 | 5,658 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 1985 | 5,555 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 1986 | 5,751 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 1987 | 6,414 1000 Int$ | +11.5% |
| 1988 | 6,960 1000 Int$ | +8.5% |
| 1989 | 6,985 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 1990 | 7,090 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1991 | 6,988 1000 Int$ | -1.4% |
| 1992 | 6,625 1000 Int$ | -5.2% |
| 1993 | 7,347 1000 Int$ | +10.9% |
| 1994 | 6,969 1000 Int$ | -5.1% |
| 1995 | 7,525 1000 Int$ | +8.0% |
| 1996 | 7,908 1000 Int$ | +5.1% |
| 1997 | 7,991 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1998 | 7,690 1000 Int$ | -3.8% |
| 1999 | 8,151 1000 Int$ | +6.0% |
| 2000 | 7,196 1000 Int$ | -11.7% |
| 2001 | 7,329 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2002 | 7,349 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 2003 | 7,400 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2004 | 7,400 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 7,131 1000 Int$ | -3.6% |
| 2006 | 7,340 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 2007 | 7,354 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2008 | 7,582 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 2009 | 8,019 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 2010 | 8,145 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2011 | 8,288 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2012 | 8,243 1000 Int$ | -0.5% |
| 2013 | 8,319 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 2014 | 8,263 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2015 | 8,209 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 8,332 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 2017 | 8,351 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2018 | 8,422 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 2019 | 8,470 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 2020 | 8,515 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2021 | 8,459 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2022 | 8,480 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2023 | 8,485 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 2024 | 8,474 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,233 1000 Int$ | 6,007 1000 Int$ | 11,230 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 6,072 1000 Int$ | 3,846 1000 Int$ | 10,304 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 5,639 1000 Int$ | 4,244 1000 Int$ | 6,985 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 7,428 1000 Int$ | 6,625 1000 Int$ | 8,151 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 7,410 1000 Int$ | 7,131 1000 Int$ | 8,019 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 8,304 1000 Int$ | 8,145 1000 Int$ | 8,470 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 8,483 1000 Int$ | 8,459 1000 Int$ | 8,515 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Poultry Birds — Stocks, annual growth rate 2.66 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Yield, annual growth rate 0.9219 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Production, annual growth rate 1.24 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.2261 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Yield, annual growth rate 0.8325 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production, annual growth rate 1.06 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 4.33 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.3601 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Production, annual growth rate 3.38 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.3055 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 8,474 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 11,230 1000 Int$ in 1969.
- What is the lowest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 3,846 1000 Int$ in 1977.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th out of 19 groups with data for 2024.
- Is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.