Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Guatemala
Guatemala: Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross was 169 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
169 1000 Int$
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
21st
of 26 countries
All-time high
584 1000 Int$
in 1972
All-time low
102 1000 Int$
in 1977
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Guatemala, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Guatemala stood at 169 1000 Int$.
The figure is down 1.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Guatemala peaked at 584 1000 Int$ in 1972 and was at its lowest, 102 1000 Int$, in 1977.
Guatemala ranks 21st of 26 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 307 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 368 1000 Int$ | +19.9% |
| 1963 | 491 1000 Int$ | +33.4% |
| 1964 | 430 1000 Int$ | -12.4% |
| 1965 | 307 1000 Int$ | -28.6% |
| 1966 | 184 1000 Int$ | -40.1% |
| 1967 | 430 1000 Int$ | +133.7% |
| 1968 | 307 1000 Int$ | -28.6% |
| 1969 | 146 1000 Int$ | -52.4% |
| 1970 | 255 1000 Int$ | +74.7% |
| 1971 | 493 1000 Int$ | +93.3% |
| 1972 | 584 1000 Int$ | +18.5% |
| 1973 | 550 1000 Int$ | -5.8% |
| 1974 | 137 1000 Int$ | -75.1% |
| 1975 | 124 1000 Int$ | -9.5% |
| 1976 | 163 1000 Int$ | +31.5% |
| 1977 | 102 1000 Int$ | -37.4% |
| 1978 | 123 1000 Int$ | +20.6% |
| 1979 | 201 1000 Int$ | +63.4% |
| 1980 | 181 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 1981 | 150 1000 Int$ | -17.1% |
| 1982 | 144 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 1983 | 149 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 1984 | 164 1000 Int$ | +10.1% |
| 1985 | 166 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1986 | 172 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 1987 | 172 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 178 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 1989 | 190 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 1990 | 198 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1991 | 203 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1992 | 209 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 1993 | 215 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1994 | 209 1000 Int$ | -2.8% |
| 1995 | 215 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1996 | 221 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1997 | 227 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1998 | 233 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1999 | 233 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 239 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 245 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 2002 | 245 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 245 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 223 1000 Int$ | -9.0% |
| 2005 | 224 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2006 | 191 1000 Int$ | -14.7% |
| 2007 | 229 1000 Int$ | +19.9% |
| 2008 | 216 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 2009 | 160 1000 Int$ | -25.9% |
| 2010 | 175 1000 Int$ | +9.4% |
| 2011 | 175 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 169 1000 Int$ | -3.4% |
| 2013 | 169 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 172 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2015 | 170 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 2016 | 164 1000 Int$ | -3.5% |
| 2017 | 169 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2018 | 169 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 168 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2020 | 168 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 169 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 2022 | 169 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 169 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 169 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 330 1000 Int$ | 146 1000 Int$ | 491 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 273.2 1000 Int$ | 102 1000 Int$ | 584 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 166.6 1000 Int$ | 144 1000 Int$ | 190 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 216.3 1000 Int$ | 198 1000 Int$ | 233 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 221.7 1000 Int$ | 160 1000 Int$ | 245 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 170 1000 Int$ | 164 1000 Int$ | 175 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 168.8 1000 Int$ | 168 1000 Int$ | 169 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More agriculture & rural data for Guatemala
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 7.71 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0955 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 630.24 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.74 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.437 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Guatemala?
- Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Guatemala was 169 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 584 1000 Int$ in 1972.
- What is the lowest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 102 1000 Int$ in 1977.
- How does Guatemala rank for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross?
- Guatemala ranks 21st out of 26 countries with data for 2024.
- Is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.