Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per in Bangladesh

Bangladesh: Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per was 17.99 in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
17.99
Change on year
up 207.5%
World rank
23rd
of 23 countries
All-time high
13,084
in 1967
All-time low
4.6
in 2017
Years of data
64
1961–2024

Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per in Bangladesh, 1961–2024

05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922024

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Analysis

Bangladesh recorded 17.99 for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per in 2024.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 207.5% on the previous year and down 73.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per in Bangladesh peaked at 13,084 in 1967 and was at its lowest, 4.6, in 2017.

Bangladesh ranks 23rd of 23 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per in Bangladesh, year by year

Annual values for Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100) in Bangladesh, 1961 to 2024.
Year Value Change
1961 9,238
1962 9,117 -1.3%
1963 8,670 -4.9%
1964 11,065 +27.6%
1965 13,054 +18.0%
1966 6,077 -53.4%
1967 13,084 +115.3%
1968 5,902 -54.9%
1969 9,435 +59.9%
1970 5,892 -37.5%
1971 4,393 -25.4%
1972 4,805 +9.4%
1973 4,387 -8.7%
1974 2,518 -42.6%
1975 2,531 +0.5%
1976 2,686 +6.1%
1977 2,862 +6.6%
1978 3,189 +11.4%
1979 2,581 -19.0%
1980 1,604 -37.9%
1981 1,545 -3.7%
1982 1,408 -8.8%
1983 1,293 -8.2%
1984 1,240 -4.1%
1985 1,392 +12.3%
1986 1,352 -2.9%
1987 1,053 -22.1%
1988 761.55 -27.7%
1989 927.96 +21.9%
1990 1,847 +99.0%
1991 630 -65.9%
1992 123.65 -80.4%
1993 121.37 -1.8%
1994 833.95 +587.1%
1995 116.94 -86.0%
1996 267.12 +128.4%
1997 112.72 -57.8%
1998 331.82 +194.4%
1999 203.81 -38.6%
2000 188.08 -7.7%
2001 173.71 -7.6%
2002 161.67 -6.9%
2003 145.78 -9.8%
2004 133.86 -8.2%
2005 122.7 -8.3%
2006 112.23 -8.5%
2007 102.34 -8.8%
2008 17.17 -83.2%
2009 23.19 +35.1%
2010 43.43 +87.3%
2011 43.87 +1.0%
2012 50.39 +14.9%
2013 87.01 +72.7%
2014 67.35 -22.6%
2015 220.57 +227.5%
2016 12.09 -94.5%
2017 4.6 -62.0%
2018 31.56 +586.1%
2019 5.04 -84.0%
2020 6.81 +35.1%
2021 5.81 -14.7%
2022 5.92 +1.9%
2023 5.85 -1.2%
2024 17.99 +207.5%

Bangladesh compared with similar countries

  • Bangladesh's 17.99 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 79.03, 23% of the median. (6 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per in Bangladesh changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
1994 +587.1% 121.37 833.95
2018 +586.1% 4.6 31.56
2015 +227.5% 67.35 220.57
2024 +207.5% 5.85 17.99
1998 +194.4% 112.72 331.82

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 9,516 5,902 13,084 9
1970s 3,584 2,518 5,892 10
1980s 1,257 761.55 1,604 10
1990s 458.81 112.72 1,847 10
2000s 118.07 17.17 188.08 10
2010s 56.59 4.6 220.57 10
2020s 8.48 5.81 17.99 5

Countries ranked near Bangladesh

  1. 20 Madagascar 60.88 compare
  2. 21 Malaysia 50.26 compare
  3. 22 Myanmar 31.11 compare

See the full ranking of 45 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Bangladesh

All data for Bangladesh →

Frequently asked questions

What is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per in Bangladesh?
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per in Bangladesh was 17.99 in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per recorded in Bangladesh?
The highest recorded value was 13,084 in 1967.
What is the lowest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per recorded in Bangladesh?
The lowest recorded value was 4.6 in 2017.
How does Bangladesh rank for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per?
Bangladesh ranks 23rd out of 23 countries with data for 2024.
Is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per rising or falling in Bangladesh?
Over the last ten years it is down 73.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Bangladesh data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per in Bangladesh. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/kenaf-and-other-textile-bast-fibres-raw-or-retted-gross-per-capita-production-index/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/kenaf-and-other-textile-bast-fibres-raw-or-retted-gross-per-capita-production-index/bangladesh/">Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per in Bangladesh</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
45 places, 2,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.