Jute, raw or retted — Gross Production Value in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Jute, raw or retted — Gross Production Value was 1.05 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
1.05 million 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 10.6%
Rank
2nd
of 5 regions
All-time high
1.05 million 1000 Int$
in 2024
All-time low
356,090 1000 Int$
in 1999
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Jute, raw or retted — Gross Production Value in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) recorded 1.05 million 1000 Int$ for jute, raw or retted — gross production value in 2024. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.6% on the previous year and up 64.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, jute, raw or retted — gross production value in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) peaked at 1.05 million 1000 Int$ in 2024 and was at its lowest, 356,090 1000 Int$, in 1999.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Jute, raw or retted — Gross Production Value in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 631,159 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 574,996 1000 Int$ | -8.9% |
| 1963 | 538,863 1000 Int$ | -6.3% |
| 1964 | 482,524 1000 Int$ | -10.5% |
| 1965 | 640,031 1000 Int$ | +32.6% |
| 1966 | 611,726 1000 Int$ | -4.4% |
| 1967 | 615,672 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1968 | 527,015 1000 Int$ | -14.4% |
| 1969 | 659,786 1000 Int$ | +25.2% |
| 1970 | 612,511 1000 Int$ | -7.2% |
| 1971 | 402,277 1000 Int$ | -34.3% |
| 1972 | 620,792 1000 Int$ | +54.3% |
| 1973 | 590,106 1000 Int$ | -4.9% |
| 1974 | 395,952 1000 Int$ | -32.9% |
| 1975 | 406,991 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1976 | 444,907 1000 Int$ | +9.3% |
| 1977 | 488,589 1000 Int$ | +9.8% |
| 1978 | 598,910 1000 Int$ | +22.6% |
| 1979 | 579,683 1000 Int$ | -3.2% |
| 1980 | 494,785 1000 Int$ | -14.6% |
| 1981 | 468,279 1000 Int$ | -5.4% |
| 1982 | 449,990 1000 Int$ | -3.9% |
| 1983 | 491,417 1000 Int$ | +9.2% |
| 1984 | 471,899 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 1985 | 685,722 1000 Int$ | +45.3% |
| 1986 | 788,275 1000 Int$ | +15.0% |
| 1987 | 609,651 1000 Int$ | -22.7% |
| 1988 | 439,064 1000 Int$ | -28.0% |
| 1989 | 418,648 1000 Int$ | -4.6% |
| 1990 | 418,087 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1991 | 469,631 1000 Int$ | +12.3% |
| 1992 | 467,809 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 1993 | 402,146 1000 Int$ | -14.0% |
| 1994 | 469,858 1000 Int$ | +16.8% |
| 1995 | 368,281 1000 Int$ | -21.6% |
| 1996 | 440,875 1000 Int$ | +19.7% |
| 1997 | 520,656 1000 Int$ | +18.1% |
| 1998 | 403,562 1000 Int$ | -22.5% |
| 1999 | 356,090 1000 Int$ | -11.8% |
| 2000 | 407,348 1000 Int$ | +14.4% |
| 2001 | 429,547 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 2002 | 404,944 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 2003 | 398,908 1000 Int$ | -1.5% |
| 2004 | 362,444 1000 Int$ | -9.1% |
| 2005 | 408,265 1000 Int$ | +12.6% |
| 2006 | 429,060 1000 Int$ | +5.1% |
| 2007 | 405,173 1000 Int$ | -5.6% |
| 2008 | 407,098 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2009 | 441,334 1000 Int$ | +8.4% |
| 2010 | 442,920 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 720,291 1000 Int$ | +62.6% |
| 2012 | 685,955 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 2013 | 657,850 1000 Int$ | -4.1% |
| 2014 | 638,016 1000 Int$ | -3.0% |
| 2015 | 660,243 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 2016 | 670,529 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2017 | 749,991 1000 Int$ | +11.9% |
| 2018 | 836,794 1000 Int$ | +11.6% |
| 2019 | 818,196 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 2020 | 887,261 1000 Int$ | +8.4% |
| 2021 | 856,917 1000 Int$ | -3.4% |
| 2022 | 929,221 1000 Int$ | +8.4% |
| 2023 | 950,852 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2024 | 1.05 million 1000 Int$ | +10.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 586,864 1000 Int$ | 482,524 1000 Int$ | 659,786 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 514,072 1000 Int$ | 395,952 1000 Int$ | 620,792 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 531,773 1000 Int$ | 418,648 1000 Int$ | 788,275 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 431,700 1000 Int$ | 356,090 1000 Int$ | 520,656 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 409,412 1000 Int$ | 362,444 1000 Int$ | 441,334 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 688,078 1000 Int$ | 442,920 1000 Int$ | 836,794 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 935,130 1000 Int$ | 856,917 1000 Int$ | 1.05 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- 1 Bangladesh 973,350 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 India 659,005 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Cambodia 71,536 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 Uzbekistan 8,931 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Nepal 4,769 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate 1.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate 3.25 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate 0.8854 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate 2.34 % change on previous year (2024)
- Swine / pigs — Stocks, annual growth rate 4.18 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing -1.77 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual 5.61 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight 6.82 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fat of pigs — Production, annual growth rate 4.93 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Yield, annual growth rate -1.34 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is jute, raw or retted — gross production value in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Jute, raw or retted — gross production value in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) was 1.05 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest jute, raw or retted — gross production value recorded in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 1.05 million 1000 Int$ in 2024.
- What is the lowest jute, raw or retted — gross production value recorded in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 356,090 1000 Int$ in 1999.
- How does Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank for jute, raw or retted — gross production value?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd out of 5 regions with data for 2024.
- Is jute, raw or retted — gross production value rising or falling in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 64.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Least Developed Countries (LDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Jute, raw or retted — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.