ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in agriculture in in Canada
Canada: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in agriculture in was 1.4 % in 2025. ◆ Volatile
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in agriculture in in Canada, 1969–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2025, ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in agriculture in in Canada stood at 1.4 %. That is the lowest value across all 57 years on record.
The figure is down 6.7% on the previous year and down 36.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in agriculture in in Canada peaked at 10.4 % in 1969 and was at its lowest, 1.4 %, in 2025.
That places Canada 101st out of 113 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in agriculture in in Canada, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 10.4 % | — |
| 1970 | 9.8 % | -5.8% |
| 1971 | 9.7 % | -1.0% |
| 1972 | 8.8 % | -9.3% |
| 1973 | 8.5 % | -3.4% |
| 1974 | 8.2 % | -3.5% |
| 1975 | 7.7 % | -6.1% |
| 1976 | 5.8 % | -24.7% |
| 1977 | 5.5 % | -5.2% |
| 1978 | 5.2 % | -5.5% |
| 1979 | 5.2 % | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 4.9 % | -5.8% |
| 1981 | 4.8 % | -2.0% |
| 1982 | 5 % | +4.2% |
| 1983 | 5.1 % | +2.0% |
| 1984 | 4.8 % | -5.9% |
| 1985 | 4.8 % | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 4.8 % | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 4.8 % | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 4.4 % | -8.3% |
| 1989 | 4.2 % | -4.5% |
| 1990 | 4.2 % | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 4.4 % | +4.8% |
| 1992 | 4.4 % | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 4.4 % | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 4.2 % | -4.5% |
| 1995 | 4 % | -4.8% |
| 1996 | 4 % | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 3.8 % | -5.0% |
| 1998 | 3.8 % | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 3.5 % | -7.9% |
| 2000 | 3.2 % | -8.6% |
| 2001 | 2.9 % | -9.4% |
| 2002 | 2.8 % | -3.4% |
| 2003 | 2.8 % | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.7 % | -3.6% |
| 2005 | 2.8 % | +3.7% |
| 2006 | 2.7 % | -3.6% |
| 2007 | 2.6 % | -3.7% |
| 2008 | 2.6 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.6 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.4 % | -7.7% |
| 2011 | 2.4 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.3 % | -4.2% |
| 2013 | 2.4 % | +4.3% |
| 2014 | 2.3 % | -4.2% |
| 2015 | 2.2 % | -4.3% |
| 2016 | 2.1 % | -4.5% |
| 2017 | 2 % | -4.8% |
| 2018 | 2 % | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 % | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2 % | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1.8 % | -10.0% |
| 2022 | 1.7 % | -5.6% |
| 2023 | 1.7 % | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.5 % | -11.8% |
| 2025 | 1.4 % | -6.7% |
Canada compared with similar countries
- Canada's 1.4 % is below the median for high income countries, which is 3.4 %, 41% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.4 % | 10.4 % | 10.4 % | 1 |
| 1970s | 7.44 % | 5.2 % | 9.8 % | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.76 % | 4.2 % | 5.1 % | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.07 % | 3.5 % | 4.4 % | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.77 % | 2.6 % | 3.2 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.21 % | 2 % | 2.4 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.68 % | 1.4 % | 2 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Canada
- 98 Barbados 1.9 % compare
- 99 Bahamas 1.6 % compare
- 100 Germany 1.5 % compare
- 101 Luxembourg 1.4 % compare
- 101 Netherlands Antilles (former) 1.4 % compare
- 101 United Arab Emirates 1.4 % compare
More agriculture & rural data for Canada
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 31.61 % change on previous year (2022)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0193 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2022)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,092 current US$ per person (2022)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.0803 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1712 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.9% (2022)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.9% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in agriculture in in Canada?
- Ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in agriculture in in Canada was 1.4 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in agriculture in recorded in Canada?
- The highest recorded value was 10.4 % in 1969.
- What is the lowest ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in agriculture in recorded in Canada?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.4 % in 2025.
- How does Canada rank for ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in agriculture in?
- Canada ranks 101st out of 113 countries with data for 2025.
- Is ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in agriculture in rising or falling in Canada?
- Over the last ten years it is down 36.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Canada data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in agriculture in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.