ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in Latvia

Latvia: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per was 40.19 No in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
40.19 No
Change on year
up 2.4%
World rank
41st
of 91 countries
All-time high
44.03 No
in 2001
All-time low
38.89 No
in 2022
Years of data
29
1996–2024

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in Latvia, 1996–2024

0102030401996201020241996: 43.6 No1997: 42.7 No1998: 42.2 No1999: 43 No2000: 42.6 No2001: 44 No2002: 43.4 No2003: 42.5 No2004: 42.1 No2005: 41.1 No2006: 41.2 No2007: 41.7 No2008: 39.7 No2009: 39.3 No2010: 39.1 No2011: 39.9 No2012: 39.6 No2013: 39.4 No2014: 39.8 No2015: 40.2 No2016: 39.6 No2017: 41.8 No2018: 39.6 No2019: 40 No2020: 40 No2021: 39.7 No2022: 38.9 No2023: 39.2 No2024: 40.2 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.

Analysis

Latvia recorded 40.19 No for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in 2024.

That represents a change of up 2.4% on the previous year and up 1.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in Latvia peaked at 44.03 No in 2001 and was at its lowest, 38.89 No, in 2022.

That places Latvia 41st out of 91 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 29 years of available data.

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Value in Latvia, 1996 to 2024.
Year No Change
1996 43.6 No
1997 42.7 No -2.1%
1998 42.22 No -1.1%
1999 43.01 No +1.9%
2000 42.6 No -1.0%
2001 44.03 No +3.4%
2002 43.37 No -1.5%
2003 42.46 No -2.1%
2004 42.15 No -0.7%
2005 41.07 No -2.6%
2006 41.19 No +0.3%
2007 41.72 No +1.3%
2008 39.69 No -4.9%
2009 39.29 No -1.0%
2010 39.1 No -0.5%
2011 39.91 No +2.1%
2012 39.6 No -0.8%
2013 39.4 No -0.5%
2014 39.76 No +0.9%
2015 40.17 No +1.0%
2016 39.59 No -1.4%
2017 41.84 No +5.7%
2018 39.62 No -5.3%
2019 40 No +1.0%
2020 39.95 No -0.1%
2021 39.67 No -0.7%
2022 38.89 No -2.0%
2023 39.25 No +0.9%
2024 40.19 No +2.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 42.88 No 42.22 No 43.6 No 4
2000s 41.76 No 39.29 No 44.03 No 10
2010s 39.9 No 39.1 No 41.84 No 10
2020s 39.59 No 38.89 No 40.19 No 5

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 38 Egypt 40.67 No compare
  2. 39 Seychelles 40.47 No compare
  3. 40 Colombia 40.25 No compare
  4. 42 Bulgaria 40.18 No compare
  5. 43 Austria 40.17 No compare
  6. 44 Australia 40.06 No compare

See the full ranking of 100 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in Latvia?
Ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in Latvia was 40.19 No in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 44.03 No in 2001.
What is the lowest ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 38.89 No in 2022.
How does Latvia rank for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per?
Latvia ranks 41st out of 91 countries with data for 2024.
Is ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/ilostat-labour-force-survey-mean-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employed-person-in/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/ilostat-labour-force-survey-mean-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employed-person-in/latvia/">ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
100 places, 2,038 data points, 1969–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.