ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in South Africa

South Africa: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per was 42.5 No in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
42.5 No
Change on year
up 2.2%
World rank
8th
of 88 countries
All-time high
47.56 No
in 2002
All-time low
41.59 No
in 2023
Years of data
25
2000–2024

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in South Africa, 2000–2024

010203040502000201220242000: 46.4 No2001: 47.4 No2002: 47.6 No2003: 46.5 No2004: 46.6 No2005: 46.6 No2006: 45.6 No2007: 47 No2008: 44.1 No2009: 44.6 No2010: 44 No2011: 44.5 No2012: 44 No2013: 43.2 No2014: 43.1 No2015: 43.5 No2016: 42.4 No2017: 42.6 No2018: 42.3 No2019: 42.2 No2020: 42.1 No2021: 42.1 No2022: 42.1 No2023: 41.6 No2024: 42.5 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.

Analysis

South Africa recorded 42.5 No for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in 2024.

That represents a change of up 2.2% on the previous year and down 1.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in South Africa peaked at 47.56 No in 2002 and was at its lowest, 41.59 No, in 2023.

That places South Africa 8th out of 88 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 25 years of available data.

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in South Africa, year by year

Annual values for ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Female — Value in South Africa, 2000 to 2024.
Year No Change
2000 46.39 No
2001 47.35 No +2.1%
2002 47.56 No +0.4%
2003 46.45 No -2.3%
2004 46.61 No +0.3%
2005 46.59 No -0.0%
2006 45.63 No -2.1%
2007 46.96 No +2.9%
2008 44.09 No -6.1%
2009 44.58 No +1.1%
2010 43.96 No -1.4%
2011 44.49 No +1.2%
2012 43.99 No -1.1%
2013 43.16 No -1.9%
2014 43.07 No -0.2%
2015 43.54 No +1.1%
2016 42.35 No -2.7%
2017 42.57 No +0.5%
2018 42.31 No -0.6%
2019 42.17 No -0.3%
2020 42.08 No -0.2%
2021 42.15 No +0.2%
2022 42.09 No -0.1%
2023 41.59 No -1.2%
2024 42.5 No +2.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 46.22 No 44.09 No 47.56 No 10
2010s 43.16 No 42.17 No 44.49 No 10
2020s 42.08 No 41.59 No 42.5 No 5

Countries ranked near South Africa

  1. 5 Seychelles 43.33 No compare
  2. 5 United Republic of Tanzania 31.37 No compare
  3. 6 Costa Rica 42.83 No compare
  4. 6 Viet Nam 31.21 No compare
  5. 7 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 28.94 No compare
  6. 7 Myanmar 42.78 No compare
  7. 9 Montenegro 41.86 No compare
  8. 10 Malaysia 41.8 No compare
  9. 11 Belgium 40.75 No compare

See the full ranking of 97 places →

More agriculture & rural data for South Africa

All data for South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in South Africa?
Ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in South Africa was 42.5 No in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per recorded in South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 47.56 No in 2002.
What is the lowest ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per recorded in South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 41.59 No in 2023.
How does South Africa rank for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per?
South Africa ranks 8th out of 88 countries with data for 2024.
Is ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per rising or falling in South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this South Africa data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in South Africa. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/ilostat-labour-force-survey-mean-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employed-person-in-3/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/ilostat-labour-force-survey-mean-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employed-person-in-3/south-africa/">ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in South Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Female — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 1,957 data points, 1969–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.