ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in Chile

Chile: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per was 37.92 No in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
37.92 No
Change on year
up 1.1%
World rank
21st
of 88 countries
All-time high
44.1 No
in 2003
All-time low
36.05 No
in 2017
Years of data
33
1992–2025

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in Chile, 1992–2025

0102030401992200820251992: 43.6 No1993: 39.3 No1994: 40.8 No1995: 40 No1996: 42 No1997: 42 No1998: 42.3 No1999: 43.2 No2000: 43.1 No2001: 43.3 No2002: 43.4 No2003: 44.1 No2004: 43.9 No2005: 40.4 No2006: 39.6 No2007: 39.8 No2008: 39.1 No2010: 37.6 No2011: 36.8 No2012: 36.5 No2013: 36.4 No2014: 36.7 No2015: 36.2 No2016: 38 No2017: 36 No2018: 36.9 No2019: 37.2 No2020: 38.8 No2021: 39.7 No2022: 38.9 No2023: 38 No2024: 37.5 No2025: 37.9 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in No.

Analysis

Chile recorded 37.92 No for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in 2025.

The figure is up 1.1% on the previous year and up 4.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in Chile peaked at 44.1 No in 2003 and was at its lowest, 36.05 No, in 2017.

That places Chile 21st out of 88 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 33 years of available data.

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in Chile, year by year

Annual values for ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Female — Value in Chile, 1992 to 2025.
Year No Change
1992 43.64 No
1993 39.33 No -9.9%
1994 40.81 No +3.8%
1995 39.96 No -2.1%
1996 42 No +5.1%
1997 42 No +0.0%
1998 42.3 No +0.7%
1999 43.2 No +2.1%
2000 43.1 No -0.2%
2001 43.3 No +0.5%
2002 43.4 No +0.2%
2003 44.1 No +1.6%
2004 43.9 No -0.5%
2005 40.4 No -8.0%
2006 39.6 No -2.0%
2007 39.8 No +0.5%
2008 39.1 No -1.8%
2010 37.64 No -3.7%
2011 36.78 No -2.3%
2012 36.48 No -0.8%
2013 36.39 No -0.2%
2014 36.69 No +0.8%
2015 36.22 No -1.3%
2016 37.98 No +4.9%
2017 36.05 No -5.1%
2018 36.93 No +2.4%
2019 37.25 No +0.9%
2020 38.78 No +4.1%
2021 39.73 No +2.4%
2022 38.93 No -2.0%
2023 37.97 No -2.5%
2024 37.49 No -1.3%
2025 37.92 No +1.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 41.66 No 39.33 No 43.64 No 8
2000s 41.86 No 39.1 No 44.1 No 9
2010s 36.84 No 36.05 No 37.98 No 10
2020s 38.47 No 37.49 No 39.73 No 6

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 18 France 39.1 No compare
  2. 19 Belarus 39 No compare
  3. 20 Spain 38.6 No compare
  4. 22 Czechia 37.82 No compare
  5. 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina 37.64 No compare
  6. 24 Uruguay 37.43 No compare

See the full ranking of 97 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in Chile?
Ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per in Chile was 37.92 No in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 44.1 No in 2003.
What is the lowest ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 36.05 No in 2017.
How does Chile rank for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per?
Chile ranks 21st out of 88 countries with data for 2025.
Is ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in Chile. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/ilostat-labour-force-survey-mean-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employed-person-in-3/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/ilostat-labour-force-survey-mean-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employed-person-in-3/chile/">ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per in Chile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Female — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 1,957 data points, 1969–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.