ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO in Cuba
Cuba: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2020. ▼ Falling
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO in Cuba, 1991–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Cuba is 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, measured in 2020. That is the lowest value across all 30 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 8.9% on the previous year and down 50.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Cuba peaked at 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1993 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP, in 2020.
That places Cuba 85th out of 164 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 30 years of available data.
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO in Cuba, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1992 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +12.3% |
| 1993 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 1994 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -21.7% |
| 1995 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 1996 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +23.7% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | +1.3% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP | 1 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More agriculture & rural data for Cuba
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -19.64 % change on previous year (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0276 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 265.29 current US$ per person (2020)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.6522 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2277 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.2% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.2% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.5% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Cuba?
- Ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Cuba was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 1993.
- What is the lowest ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 No per US$ of GDP in 2020.
- How does Cuba rank for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
- Cuba ranks 85th out of 164 countries with data for 2020.
- Is ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.