ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO in Belarus
Belarus: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO was 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Belarus is 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and down 4.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Belarus peaked at 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre, in 2015.
That places Belarus 105th out of 164 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 32 years of available data.
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO in Belarus, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.0029 1000 No per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1995 | 0.0026 1000 No per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1996 | 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2000 | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2001 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0024 1000 No per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2004 | 0.0022 1000 No per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2005 | 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2006 | 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2007 | 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2009 | 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2010 | 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2011 | 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2012 | 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2013 | 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2019 | 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2020 | 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2021 | 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2022 | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0027 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0023 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0021 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0025 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 102 Eswatini 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 103 Ireland 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 104 Iraq 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 106 Czechia 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 107 Papua New Guinea 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 108 United Arab Emirates 0.0014 1000 No per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 709.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2051 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Belarus?
- Ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Belarus was 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0032 1000 No per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre in 2015.
- How does Belarus rank for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
- Belarus ranks 105th out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
- Is ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Male — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.