ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO in Belarus
Belarus: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO was 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Belarus stood at 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 32 years on record.
The figure is down 2.7% on the previous year and down 11.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Belarus peaked at 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre, in 2023.
That places Belarus 91st out of 164 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 32 years of available data.
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO in Belarus, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.0019 1000 No per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0018 1000 No per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1995 | 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1996 | 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1998 | 0.0016 1000 No per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2000 | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2001 | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2003 | 0.0014 1000 No per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2004 | 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2005 | 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2006 | 0.0012 1000 No per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0011 1000 No per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2009 | 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2010 | 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2012 | 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2013 | 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2018 | 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2019 | 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2021 | 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2023 | 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre | -2.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0017 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0013 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0015 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.001 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 88 Panama 0.0009 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 89 Switzerland 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 90 Eswatini 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 92 Slovenia 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 93 North Macedonia 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 94 Italy 0.0007 1000 No per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 709.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2051 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Belarus?
- Ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo in Belarus was 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.002 1000 No per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0008 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023.
- How does Belarus rank for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
- Belarus ranks 91st out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
- Is ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Female — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.