Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Cuba
Cuba: Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate was 0 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
0 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 100.0%
World rank
106th
of 209 countries
All-time high
30.06 % change on previous year
in 1997
All-time low
-31.35 % change on previous year
in 1992
Years of data
63
1962–2024
Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Cuba, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2024, hen eggs in shell, fresh — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Cuba stood at 0 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, hen eggs in shell, fresh — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Cuba peaked at 30.06 % change on previous year in 1997 and was at its lowest, -31.35 % change on previous year, in 1992.
Cuba ranks 106th of 209 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Cuba, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 1.54 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 5.05 % change on previous year | +228.5% |
| 1964 | 2.75 % change on previous year | -45.7% |
| 1965 | 4 % change on previous year | +45.6% |
| 1966 | 4.23 % change on previous year | +5.9% |
| 1967 | 0.2901 % change on previous year | -93.1% |
| 1968 | 1.36 % change on previous year | +370.1% |
| 1969 | -5.94 % change on previous year | -535.7% |
| 1970 | 5.64 % change on previous year | -195.0% |
| 1971 | 0.564 % change on previous year | -90.0% |
| 1972 | 3.92 % change on previous year | +594.3% |
| 1973 | 3.13 % change on previous year | -20.1% |
| 1974 | 8.19 % change on previous year | +161.7% |
| 1975 | 8.06 % change on previous year | -1.7% |
| 1976 | -4.66 % change on previous year | -157.8% |
| 1977 | 0.3585 % change on previous year | -107.7% |
| 1978 | 2.3 % change on previous year | +540.6% |
| 1979 | 3.46 % change on previous year | +50.6% |
| 1980 | 2.63 % change on previous year | -24.0% |
| 1981 | -8.91 % change on previous year | -439.1% |
| 1982 | -0.3955 % change on previous year | -95.6% |
| 1983 | 5.03 % change on previous year | -1372.4% |
| 1984 | 0.0329 % change on previous year | -99.3% |
| 1985 | 0.304 % change on previous year | +824.7% |
| 1986 | -1.13 % change on previous year | -471.8% |
| 1987 | -0.6627 % change on previous year | -41.4% |
| 1988 | -3.43 % change on previous year | +417.2% |
| 1989 | -5.59 % change on previous year | +63.0% |
| 1990 | 7.92 % change on previous year | -241.8% |
| 1991 | -1.68 % change on previous year | -121.2% |
| 1992 | -31.35 % change on previous year | +1768.2% |
| 1993 | -20.99 % change on previous year | -33.0% |
| 1994 | 16.78 % change on previous year | -179.9% |
| 1995 | 7.84 % change on previous year | -53.3% |
| 1996 | -9.49 % change on previous year | -221.1% |
| 1997 | 30.06 % change on previous year | -416.8% |
| 1998 | -15.09 % change on previous year | -150.2% |
| 1999 | 29.99 % change on previous year | -298.7% |
| 2000 | -4.26 % change on previous year | -114.2% |
| 2001 | 11.61 % change on previous year | -372.2% |
| 2002 | 10.4 % change on previous year | -10.4% |
| 2003 | -0.3623 % change on previous year | -103.5% |
| 2004 | -3.99 % change on previous year | +1001.7% |
| 2005 | -0.7747 % change on previous year | -80.6% |
| 2006 | -6.75 % change on previous year | +771.2% |
| 2007 | -1.47 % change on previous year | -78.2% |
| 2008 | -2.62 % change on previous year | +77.9% |
| 2009 | 1.96 % change on previous year | -174.9% |
| 2010 | 1.67 % change on previous year | -14.5% |
| 2011 | 1.23 % change on previous year | -26.2% |
| 2012 | -4.47 % change on previous year | -462.2% |
| 2013 | 2.13 % change on previous year | -147.6% |
| 2014 | -3.75 % change on previous year | -276.2% |
| 2015 | -0.8658 % change on previous year | -76.9% |
| 2016 | 2.62 % change on previous year | -402.6% |
| 2017 | -0.8511 % change on previous year | -132.5% |
| 2018 | 0.2243 % change on previous year | -126.4% |
| 2019 | 0.0779 % change on previous year | -65.3% |
| 2020 | 1.89 % change on previous year | +2323.1% |
| 2021 | -7.75 % change on previous year | -510.8% |
| 2022 | 8.44 % change on previous year | -208.9% |
| 2023 | -3.28 % change on previous year | -138.9% |
| 2024 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | +2323.1% | 0.0779 % change on previous year | 1.89 % change on previous year |
| 1992 | -1768.2% | -1.68 % change on previous year | -31.35 % change on previous year |
| 1983 | +1372.4% | -0.3955 % change on previous year | 5.03 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.66 % change on previous year | -5.94 % change on previous year | 5.05 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 3.1 % change on previous year | -4.66 % change on previous year | 8.19 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.21 % change on previous year | -8.91 % change on previous year | 5.03 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.4 % change on previous year | -31.35 % change on previous year | 30.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3738 % change on previous year | -6.75 % change on previous year | 11.61 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.198 % change on previous year | -4.47 % change on previous year | 2.62 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.1406 % change on previous year | -7.75 % change on previous year | 8.44 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 103 Spain 0.0172 % change on previous year compare
- 104 Costa Rica 0.0142 % change on previous year compare
- 105 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0.0124 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Afghanistan 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Belarus 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Fiji 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Grenada 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Honduras 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Ireland 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Cambodia 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Kiribati 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Madagascar 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Nauru 0 % change on previous year
- 106 Papua New Guinea 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Qatar 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Sudan 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Zimbabwe 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Cook Islands 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Timor-Leste 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 China, mainland 0 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Ethiopia PDR 0 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Cuba
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -19.64 % change on previous year (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0276 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 265.29 current US$ per person (2020)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.6522 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2277 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.2% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.2% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.5% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is hen eggs in shell, fresh — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Cuba?
- Hen eggs in shell, fresh — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Cuba was 0 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest hen eggs in shell, fresh — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 30.06 % change on previous year in 1997.
- What is the lowest hen eggs in shell, fresh — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -31.35 % change on previous year in 1992.
- How does Cuba rank for hen eggs in shell, fresh — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 106th out of 209 countries with data for 2024.
- Is hen eggs in shell, fresh — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Yield/Carcass Weight. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Yield/Carcass Weight Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Yield/Carcass Weight. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.