Green garlic — Gross Production Value in Peru
Peru: Green garlic — Gross Production Value was 71,209 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Green garlic — Gross Production Value in Peru, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for green garlic — gross production value in Peru is 71,209 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 0.9% on the previous year and up 20.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, green garlic — gross production value in Peru peaked at 82,159 1000 Int$ in 2022 and was at its lowest, 4,688 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places Peru 18th out of 98 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Green garlic — Gross Production Value in Peru, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 4,688 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 7,937 1000 Int$ | +69.3% |
| 1963 | 8,885 1000 Int$ | +11.9% |
| 1964 | 4,870 1000 Int$ | -45.2% |
| 1965 | 5,098 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1966 | 4,789 1000 Int$ | -6.1% |
| 1967 | 5,164 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 1968 | 6,254 1000 Int$ | +21.1% |
| 1969 | 6,185 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1970 | 5,029 1000 Int$ | -18.7% |
| 1971 | 5,388 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1972 | 7,225 1000 Int$ | +34.1% |
| 1973 | 7,261 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 1974 | 7,479 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 1975 | 8,145 1000 Int$ | +8.9% |
| 1976 | 9,231 1000 Int$ | +13.3% |
| 1977 | 6,648 1000 Int$ | -28.0% |
| 1978 | 8,552 1000 Int$ | +28.6% |
| 1979 | 9,549 1000 Int$ | +11.7% |
| 1980 | 7,863 1000 Int$ | -17.7% |
| 1981 | 7,467 1000 Int$ | -5.0% |
| 1982 | 10,847 1000 Int$ | +45.3% |
| 1983 | 9,336 1000 Int$ | -13.9% |
| 1984 | 8,901 1000 Int$ | -4.7% |
| 1985 | 7,682 1000 Int$ | -13.7% |
| 1986 | 12,231 1000 Int$ | +59.2% |
| 1987 | 11,526 1000 Int$ | -5.8% |
| 1988 | 14,813 1000 Int$ | +28.5% |
| 1989 | 16,713 1000 Int$ | +12.8% |
| 1990 | 11,172 1000 Int$ | -33.2% |
| 1991 | 14,552 1000 Int$ | +30.3% |
| 1992 | 14,101 1000 Int$ | -3.1% |
| 1993 | 11,960 1000 Int$ | -15.2% |
| 1994 | 17,378 1000 Int$ | +45.3% |
| 1995 | 23,263 1000 Int$ | +33.9% |
| 1996 | 30,215 1000 Int$ | +29.9% |
| 1997 | 29,996 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 1998 | 21,576 1000 Int$ | -28.1% |
| 1999 | 28,782 1000 Int$ | +33.4% |
| 2000 | 36,500 1000 Int$ | +26.8% |
| 2001 | 46,185 1000 Int$ | +26.5% |
| 2002 | 45,420 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 2003 | 41,825 1000 Int$ | -7.9% |
| 2004 | 35,530 1000 Int$ | -15.1% |
| 2005 | 39,656 1000 Int$ | +11.6% |
| 2006 | 53,098 1000 Int$ | +33.9% |
| 2007 | 58,439 1000 Int$ | +10.1% |
| 2008 | 48,831 1000 Int$ | -16.4% |
| 2009 | 41,891 1000 Int$ | -14.2% |
| 2010 | 45,483 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 2011 | 63,909 1000 Int$ | +40.5% |
| 2012 | 59,355 1000 Int$ | -7.1% |
| 2013 | 58,808 1000 Int$ | -0.9% |
| 2014 | 58,879 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 2015 | 64,836 1000 Int$ | +10.1% |
| 2016 | 56,495 1000 Int$ | -12.9% |
| 2017 | 68,546 1000 Int$ | +21.3% |
| 2018 | 75,636 1000 Int$ | +10.3% |
| 2019 | 59,952 1000 Int$ | -20.7% |
| 2020 | 65,533 1000 Int$ | +9.3% |
| 2021 | 79,146 1000 Int$ | +20.8% |
| 2022 | 82,159 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 2023 | 70,598 1000 Int$ | -14.1% |
| 2024 | 71,209 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,986 1000 Int$ | 4,688 1000 Int$ | 8,885 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 7,451 1000 Int$ | 5,029 1000 Int$ | 9,549 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 10,738 1000 Int$ | 7,467 1000 Int$ | 16,713 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 20,300 1000 Int$ | 11,172 1000 Int$ | 30,215 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 44,738 1000 Int$ | 35,530 1000 Int$ | 58,439 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 61,190 1000 Int$ | 45,483 1000 Int$ | 75,636 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 73,729 1000 Int$ | 65,533 1000 Int$ | 82,159 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Peru
- 15 Russian Federation 97,040 1000 Int$ compare
- 16 Pakistan 85,136 1000 Int$ compare
- 17 Mexico 77,359 1000 Int$ compare
- 19 Kyrgyzstan 61,715 1000 Int$ compare
- 20 Nepal 52,272 1000 Int$ compare
- 21 Yugoslav SFR 40,999 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Peru
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.59 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0747 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 637.02 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.72 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.144 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 7.47 (2024)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 7.47 (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is green garlic — gross production value in Peru?
- Green garlic — gross production value in Peru was 71,209 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest green garlic — gross production value recorded in Peru?
- The highest recorded value was 82,159 1000 Int$ in 2022.
- What is the lowest green garlic — gross production value recorded in Peru?
- The lowest recorded value was 4,688 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Peru rank for green garlic — gross production value?
- Peru ranks 18th out of 98 countries with data for 2024.
- Is green garlic — gross production value rising or falling in Peru?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Peru data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Green garlic — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.