Gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of in United Republic of Tanzania
United Republic of Tanzania: Gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of was -4.03 % in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of in United Republic of Tanzania, 2000–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
United Republic of Tanzania recorded -4.03 % for gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.4% on the previous year and down 210.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of in United Republic of Tanzania peaked at 25.93 % in 2019 and was at its lowest, -31.74 %, in 2009.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of in United Republic of Tanzania, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | -4.69 % | — |
| 2001 | -4.69 % | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -4.71 % | +0.4% |
| 2003 | -4.8 % | +1.9% |
| 2004 | -4.83 % | +0.6% |
| 2005 | -4.84 % | +0.2% |
| 2006 | -7.76 % | +60.3% |
| 2007 | -23.01 % | +196.5% |
| 2008 | -3.07 % | -86.7% |
| 2009 | -31.74 % | +933.9% |
| 2010 | -4.06 % | -87.2% |
| 2011 | -22.21 % | +447.0% |
| 2012 | -8.56 % | -61.5% |
| 2013 | 3.66 % | -142.8% |
| 2014 | -6.27 % | -271.3% |
| 2015 | 24.37 % | -488.7% |
| 2016 | 24.86 % | +2.0% |
| 2017 | 25.29 % | +1.7% |
| 2018 | 25.58 % | +1.1% |
| 2019 | 25.93 % | +1.4% |
| 2020 | -5.02 % | -119.4% |
| 2021 | -3.65 % | -27.3% |
| 2022 | -3.86 % | +5.8% |
| 2023 | -4.03 % | +4.4% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of in United Republic of Tanzania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | -933.9% | -3.07 % | -31.74 % |
| 2015 | +488.7% | -6.27 % | 24.37 % |
| 2011 | -447.0% | -4.06 % | -22.21 % |
| 2014 | -271.3% | 3.66 % | -6.27 % |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -9.41 % | -31.74 % | -3.07 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.86 % | -22.21 % | 25.93 % | 10 |
| 2020s | -4.14 % | -5.02 % | -3.65 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near United Republic of Tanzania
- 6 Guatemala 15.9 % compare
- 6 Iran (Islamic Republic of) -0.26 % compare
- 7 Cuba 15.44 % compare
- 7 Timor-Leste -1.46 % compare
- 8 Botswana 15.18 % compare
- 8 Melanesia -3.47 % compare
- 9 Benin 13.7 % compare
- 10 El Salvador 13.23 % compare
- 11 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) -4.52 % compare
- 11 Nigeria 12.73 % compare
- 12 Democratic People's Republic of Korea -6.82 % compare
- 12 Saint Lucia 12.44 % compare
More agriculture & rural data for United Republic of Tanzania
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Yield, annual 0.2828 % change on previous year (2024)
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested -26.5 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered 1.6 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, annual growth rate 11.68 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth 10 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered 3.54 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Production, annual growth rate 11.49 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth 7.69 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered 2.04 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Production, annual growth rate 11.33 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of in United Republic of Tanzania?
- Gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of in United Republic of Tanzania was -4.03 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of recorded in United Republic of Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 25.93 % in 2019.
- What is the lowest gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of recorded in United Republic of Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was -31.74 % in 2009.
- How does United Republic of Tanzania rank for gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of?
- United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th out of 14 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of rising or falling in United Republic of Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 210.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this United Republic of Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of total employment by subindustry: Employment in agriculture — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.