Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Suriname
Suriname: Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre was 0.24 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Suriname, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
Suriname recorded 0.24 t per square kilometre for fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.6% on the previous year and down 72.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Suriname peaked at 0.8722 t per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.0788 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
Suriname ranks 154th of 170 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Suriname, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0788 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1503 t per square kilometre | +90.7% |
| 1963 | 0.1668 t per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1964 | 0.1234 t per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 1965 | 0.2188 t per square kilometre | +77.3% |
| 1966 | 0.2842 t per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1967 | 0.3536 t per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 1968 | 0.4176 t per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1969 | 0.4174 t per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.3552 t per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1971 | 0.4215 t per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1972 | 0.3954 t per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1973 | 0.3745 t per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1974 | 0.3595 t per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1975 | 0.3729 t per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1976 | 0.3685 t per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1977 | 0.3127 t per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1978 | 0.3195 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1979 | 0.2751 t per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1980 | 0.3259 t per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1981 | 0.3763 t per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1982 | 0.344 t per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 1983 | 0.3199 t per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1984 | 0.3609 t per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1985 | 0.3895 t per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1986 | 0.3713 t per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1987 | 0.4354 t per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1988 | 0.5048 t per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1989 | 0.4662 t per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1990 | 0.4831 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1991 | 0.5736 t per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1992 | 0.5679 t per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1993 | 0.5856 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1994 | 0.5684 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1995 | 0.5799 t per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1996 | 0.4777 t per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1997 | 0.4884 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1998 | 0.4378 t per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1999 | 0.5221 t per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 2000 | 0.4749 t per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2001 | 0.4683 t per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2002 | 0.2517 t per square kilometre | -46.3% |
| 2003 | 0.2211 t per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 2004 | 0.4346 t per square kilometre | +96.5% |
| 2005 | 0.5557 t per square kilometre | +27.9% |
| 2006 | 0.5802 t per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2007 | 0.6576 t per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2008 | 0.7466 t per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2009 | 0.7392 t per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2010 | 0.8196 t per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2011 | 0.7665 t per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2012 | 0.8426 t per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2013 | 0.8722 t per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2014 | 0.8242 t per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2015 | 0.7279 t per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 2016 | 0.6613 t per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2017 | 0.7153 t per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2018 | 0.6234 t per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 2019 | 0.4723 t per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 2020 | 0.3677 t per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 2021 | 0.3204 t per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 2022 | 0.2416 t per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 2023 | 0.24 t per square kilometre | -0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2457 t per square kilometre | 0.0788 t per square kilometre | 0.4176 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.3555 t per square kilometre | 0.2751 t per square kilometre | 0.4215 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3894 t per square kilometre | 0.3199 t per square kilometre | 0.5048 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.5285 t per square kilometre | 0.4378 t per square kilometre | 0.5856 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.513 t per square kilometre | 0.2211 t per square kilometre | 0.7466 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.7325 t per square kilometre | 0.4723 t per square kilometre | 0.8722 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2924 t per square kilometre | 0.24 t per square kilometre | 0.3677 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
- 151 Libya 0.3914 t per square kilometre compare
- 152 Somalia 0.359 t per square kilometre compare
- 153 Central African Republic 0.2898 t per square kilometre compare
- 155 Djibouti 0.2205 t per square kilometre compare
- 156 Latvia 0.1766 t per square kilometre compare
- 157 Zambia 0.1712 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Suriname
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 20.23 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0677 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 471.32 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.7818 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3421 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.8% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.8% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 6.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.1% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Suriname?
- Fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Suriname was 0.24 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fruit primary — production, per square kilometre recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was 0.8722 t per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest fruit primary — production, per square kilometre recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0788 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Suriname rank for fruit primary — production, per square kilometre?
- Suriname ranks 154th out of 170 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fruit primary — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is down 72.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Fruit Primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Fruit Primary — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Fruit Primary — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Fruit Primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.