Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Mozambique
Mozambique: Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre was 0.9337 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Mozambique, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Mozambique is 0.9337 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 11.4% on the previous year and down 19.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Mozambique peaked at 1.3 t per square kilometre in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.3121 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
Mozambique ranks 140th of 170 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.3121 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.3134 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1963 | 0.3383 t per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1964 | 0.3446 t per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1965 | 0.3357 t per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1966 | 0.337 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1967 | 0.3383 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1968 | 0.333 t per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1969 | 0.3749 t per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1970 | 0.3872 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1971 | 0.44 t per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1972 | 0.4374 t per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1973 | 0.447 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1974 | 0.4559 t per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1975 | 0.3783 t per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1976 | 0.3898 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1977 | 0.4018 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1978 | 0.4044 t per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1979 | 0.4114 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1980 | 0.4101 t per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1981 | 0.4266 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1982 | 0.4241 t per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1983 | 0.426 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1984 | 0.426 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.4241 t per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1986 | 0.4413 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1987 | 0.4546 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1988 | 0.4616 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1989 | 0.4762 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1990 | 0.485 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1991 | 0.4428 t per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1992 | 0.3566 t per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1993 | 0.423 t per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1994 | 0.3955 t per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1995 | 0.4282 t per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1996 | 0.4549 t per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1997 | 0.4654 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1998 | 0.477 t per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1999 | 0.4847 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2000 | 0.3698 t per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 2001 | 0.3965 t per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2002 | 0.429 t per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2003 | 0.4419 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2004 | 0.4488 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2005 | 0.5074 t per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 2006 | 0.5619 t per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2007 | 0.6167 t per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2008 | 0.6754 t per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2009 | 0.7388 t per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2010 | 0.8225 t per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2011 | 0.8549 t per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2012 | 1.03 t per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 2013 | 1.16 t per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2014 | 1.17 t per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2015 | 1.3 t per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2016 | 1.11 t per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2017 | 1.28 t per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2018 | 1.09 t per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2019 | 1.1 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2020 | 1.14 t per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2021 | 1.04 t per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 2022 | 1.05 t per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2023 | 0.9337 t per square kilometre | -11.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3364 t per square kilometre | 0.3121 t per square kilometre | 0.3749 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.4153 t per square kilometre | 0.3783 t per square kilometre | 0.4559 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4371 t per square kilometre | 0.4101 t per square kilometre | 0.4762 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.4413 t per square kilometre | 0.3566 t per square kilometre | 0.485 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.5186 t per square kilometre | 0.3698 t per square kilometre | 0.7388 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.09 t per square kilometre | 0.8225 t per square kilometre | 1.3 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.04 t per square kilometre | 0.9337 t per square kilometre | 1.14 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 137 Kazakhstan 1.2 t per square kilometre compare
- 138 Solomon Islands 1.04 t per square kilometre compare
- 139 Gambia 0.9858 t per square kilometre compare
- 141 South Sudan 0.8278 t per square kilometre compare
- 142 Congo 0.7977 t per square kilometre compare
- 143 Lithuania 0.7912 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Mozambique
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2557 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2557 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 160.3 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.63 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6279 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 25.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 25.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Mozambique?
- Fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Mozambique was 0.9337 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fruit primary — production, per square kilometre recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 1.3 t per square kilometre in 2015.
- What is the lowest fruit primary — production, per square kilometre recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3121 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Mozambique rank for fruit primary — production, per square kilometre?
- Mozambique ranks 140th out of 170 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fruit primary — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Fruit Primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Fruit Primary — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Fruit Primary — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Fruit Primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.