Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Belarus
Belarus: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2024. ▼ Falling
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Belarus, 1994–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Belarus is 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
The figure is down 7.9% on the previous year and up 2.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Belarus peaked at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
That places Belarus 79th out of 138 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 31 years of available data.
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Belarus, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1995 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +7.2% |
| 1996 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +9.3% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -44.3% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +10.3% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +39.0% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +14.6% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +28.2% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -51.6% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +6.2% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +37.5% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -45.5% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +39.4% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -49.3% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +18.9% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -16.5% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +10.6% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +57.4% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +21.5% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -32.5% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +45.1% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -36.5% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +41.6% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -30.7% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 6 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 709.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2051 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Belarus?
- Fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Belarus was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2002.
- What is the lowest fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Belarus rank for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
- Belarus ranks 79th out of 138 countries with data for 2024.
- Is fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.