Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Canada
Canada: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Canada, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Canada recorded 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in 2024.
The figure is up 1.5% on the previous year and down 19.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Canada peaked at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 1963 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, in 2010.
Canada ranks 148th of 169 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Canada, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +3.9% |
| 1963 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +6.4% |
| 1964 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 1965 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -19.5% |
| 1966 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 1967 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 1968 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -19.5% |
| 1969 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1970 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1971 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1972 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -21.0% |
| 1973 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1974 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 1975 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 1976 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -24.5% |
| 1977 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 1978 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 1979 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1980 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 1981 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -23.5% |
| 1982 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +10.9% |
| 1983 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 1984 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 1985 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 1986 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -18.0% |
| 1987 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +14.2% |
| 1988 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 1989 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 1990 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 1991 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1992 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +13.6% |
| 1993 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1994 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +13.7% |
| 1995 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 1996 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +3.5% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +17.7% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -14.0% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -18.5% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +19.6% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -25.7% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +21.9% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +13.4% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +21.3% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -15.9% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -21.4% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +9.5% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
Canada compared with similar countries
- Canada's 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, 48% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Canada
More agriculture & rural data for Canada
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 31.61 % change on previous year (2022)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0193 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2022)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,092 current US$ per person (2022)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.0803 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1712 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.9% (2022)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.9% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Canada?
- Fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Canada was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Canada?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 1963.
- What is the lowest fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Canada?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2010.
- How does Canada rank for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
- Canada ranks 148th out of 169 countries with data for 2024.
- Is fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) rising or falling in Canada?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Canada data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.