Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Total Industries in Lithuania
Lithuania: Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Total Industries was 100 % in 2015. ▬ Flat
Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Total Industries in Lithuania, 2005–2015
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2015, food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — total industries in Lithuania stood at 100 %. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — total industries in Lithuania peaked at 100 % in 2005 and was at its lowest, 100 %, in 2005.
That places Lithuania 1st out of 63 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the top 10%.
Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Total Industries in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 100 % | — |
| 2006 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 100 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % | 5 |
| 2010s | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
- 1 Argentina 100 % compare
- 1 Australia 100 % compare
- 1 Austria 100 % compare
- 1 Belgium 100 % compare
- 1 Brazil 100 % compare
- 1 Brunei Darussalam 100 % compare
- 1 Bulgaria 100 % compare
- 1 Cambodia 100 % compare
- 1 Canada 100 % compare
- 1 Chile 100 % compare
- 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 100 % compare
- 1 China, mainland 100 % compare
- 1 China, Taiwan Province of 100 % compare
- 1 Colombia 100 % compare
- 1 Costa Rica 100 % compare
- 1 Croatia 100 % compare
- 1 Cyprus 100 % compare
- 1 Czechia 100 % compare
- 1 Denmark 100 % compare
- 1 Ecuador 100 % compare
- 1 Estonia 100 % compare
- 1 Finland 100 % compare
- 1 France 100 % compare
- 1 Germany 100 % compare
- 1 Greece 100 % compare
- 1 Hungary 100 % compare
- 1 Iceland 100 % compare
- 1 India 100 % compare
- 1 Indonesia 100 % compare
- 1 Ireland 100 % compare
- 1 Israel 100 % compare
- 1 Italy 100 % compare
- 1 Japan 100 % compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 100 % compare
- 1 Latvia 100 % compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100 % compare
- 1 Malaysia 100 % compare
- 1 Malta 100 % compare
- 1 Mexico 100 % compare
- 1 Morocco 100 % compare
- 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 100 % compare
- 1 New Zealand 100 % compare
- 1 Norway 100 % compare
- 1 Peru 100 % compare
- 1 Philippines 100 % compare
- 1 Poland 100 % compare
- 1 Portugal 100 % compare
- 1 Republic of Korea 100 % compare
- 1 Romania 100 % compare
- 1 Russian Federation 100 % compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 100 % compare
- 1 Singapore 100 % compare
- 1 Slovakia 100 % compare
- 1 Slovenia 100 % compare
- 1 South Africa 100 % compare
- 1 Spain 100 % compare
- 1 Sweden 100 % compare
- 1 Switzerland 100 % compare
- 1 Thailand 100 % compare
- 1 Tunisia 100 % compare
- 1 T�rkiye 100 % compare
- 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 % compare
More agriculture & rural data for Lithuania
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 4.69 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0227 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 748.66 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.7947 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3092 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — total industries in Lithuania?
- Food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — total industries in Lithuania was 100 % in 2015, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — total industries recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 100 % in 2005.
- What is the lowest food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — total industries recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 100 % in 2005.
- How does Lithuania rank for food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — total industries?
- Lithuania ranks 1st out of 63 countries with data for 2015.
- Is food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — total industries rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Total Industries — Operating surplus — Industry share. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
This domain contains data on three food value measures, namely: (1) Food At Home (FAH); (2) Food and Tobacco at Home (FTAH); (3) Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH), disaggregated by four primary factors (Operating Surplus, Labor, Taxes, Imports) and by five food value chain industries (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; Manufacture of food, beverages and tobacco products; Transportation and storage; Wholesale and retail trade; Accommodation and food service activities). The three food value measures differ for the bundle of goods and services they account for. In particular, the FAH refers to domestic expenditures of personal consumption for food consumed at home, at purchaser prices. The FTAH measure is similar in its target, but it refers to a broader set of economic goods, inclusive of tobacco, as food and tobacco expenditures are not always separable in the original data. On the other side, the FAAFH refers to domestic expenditures of personal consumption for food consumed away from home (e.g. in restaurants), at purchaser prices, and it also includes expenditures for accommodation in all the cases where the two types of expenditures were not separable in the original data. The values of industry decomposition measure the food production value-added distribution across different industries and factors involved in the agri-food value chain. All these estimates are based on Leontief Input Ouput modeling and Industry reduction method. The Food Value Chain domain aims to supply informaiton relevant for the SDG 12 - sustainable consumption and production patterns, SDG 2 - zero hunger and SDG 1 - no poverty, that constitue guiding SDGs in the FAO Strategic Framework 2022-2031 and its better production pillar. More in general they may inform national, regional and global food policy, including measures in the World Food Summit framework. Data are collected from national Supply and Use Tables (SUTs) and Industry by Industry Input Output tables (IOTs), via OECD database or NSOs. All input data are in line with the System of National Accounts (SNA) and main international classifications and standards related to environmental-economic accounting (respectively the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, SEEA AFF, and the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, ISIC).