Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita in Bermuda

Bermuda: Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita was 45.59 kilograms per year per capita in 2009. ▲ Rising

Latest (2009)
45.59 kilograms per year per capita
Change on year
down 0.6%
World rank
15th
of 191 countries
All-time high
50.02 kilograms per year per capita
in 1988
All-time low
29.5 kilograms per year per capita
in 1965
Years of data
49
1961–2009

Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita in Bermuda, 1961–2009

0204060196119852009

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.

Analysis

Bermuda recorded 45.59 kilograms per year per capita for fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita in 2009.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.6% on the previous year and up 24.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita in Bermuda peaked at 50.02 kilograms per year per capita in 1988 and was at its lowest, 29.5 kilograms per year per capita, in 1965.

That places Bermuda 15th out of 191 countries with data for 2009, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 49 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 34.88 kilograms per year per capita 29.5 kilograms per year per capita 39.17 kilograms per year per capita 9
1970s 38.79 kilograms per year per capita 34.94 kilograms per year per capita 42.69 kilograms per year per capita 10
1980s 45 kilograms per year per capita 39.06 kilograms per year per capita 50.02 kilograms per year per capita 10
1990s 41.17 kilograms per year per capita 34.83 kilograms per year per capita 47.96 kilograms per year per capita 10
2000s 44.92 kilograms per year per capita 37.09 kilograms per year per capita 47 kilograms per year per capita 10

Countries ranked near Bermuda

  1. 12 Norway 49.1 kilograms per year per capita compare
  2. 13 Micronesia (country) 48.98 kilograms per year per capita compare
  3. 14 Samoa 46.62 kilograms per year per capita compare
  4. 16 Japan 44.98 kilograms per year per capita compare
  5. 17 Marshall Islands 44.55 kilograms per year per capita compare
  6. 18 Barbados 43.16 kilograms per year per capita compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Bermuda

All data for Bermuda →

Frequently asked questions

What is fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita in Bermuda?
Fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita in Bermuda was 45.59 kilograms per year per capita in 2009, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Bermuda?
The highest recorded value was 50.02 kilograms per year per capita in 1988.
What is the lowest fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Bermuda?
The lowest recorded value was 29.5 kilograms per year per capita in 1965.
How does Bermuda rank for fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita?
Bermuda ranks 15th out of 191 countries with data for 2009.
Is fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Bermuda?
Over the last ten years it is up 24.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Bermuda data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 49 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,213 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.