Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita in Belarus
Belarus: Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita was 12.46 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▲ Rising
Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita in Belarus is 12.46 kilograms per year per capita, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 0.6% on the previous year and down 23.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita in Belarus peaked at 18.15 kilograms per year per capita in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.9745 kilograms per year per capita, in 1992.
That places Belarus 111th out of 191 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.16 kilograms per year per capita | 0.9745 kilograms per year per capita | 11.11 kilograms per year per capita | 8 |
| 2000s | 15.31 kilograms per year per capita | 9.78 kilograms per year per capita | 18.15 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2010s | 13.7 kilograms per year per capita | 11.18 kilograms per year per capita | 16.85 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2020s | 12.32 kilograms per year per capita | 12.15 kilograms per year per capita | 12.46 kilograms per year per capita | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 108 Libya 12.88 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 109 Mozambique 12.87 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 110 Estonia 12.7 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 112 Korea, Dem. People's Rep. 12.3 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 113 Uruguay 11.93 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 114 Montenegro 11.92 kilograms per year per capita compare
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 6.44 billion current US$ (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 6.9% (2025)
- Rural population 1.86 million (2025)
- Rural population growth -2.2% (2025)
- Rural population 20.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.9% (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.9% (2025)
- Land under cereal production 2.28 million hectares (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita in Belarus?
- Fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita in Belarus was 12.46 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 18.15 kilograms per year per capita in 2008.
- What is the lowest fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.9745 kilograms per year per capita in 1992.
- How does Belarus rank for fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita?
- Belarus ranks 111th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.