Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP in Belarus
Belarus: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ▼ Falling
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP in Belarus, 1992–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp in Belarus is 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 7.8% on the previous year and down 1.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp in Belarus peaked at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
That places Belarus 51st out of 113 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 33 years of available data.
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP in Belarus, year by year
| Year | kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1993 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +26.8% |
| 1994 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +8.1% |
| 1995 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +10.8% |
| 1996 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1997 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -40.3% |
| 1998 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +22.1% |
| 1999 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -27.8% |
| 2000 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +58.0% |
| 2001 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 2002 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
| 2003 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +28.1% |
| 2004 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 2005 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -27.0% |
| 2006 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -48.2% |
| 2007 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +9.2% |
| 2008 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 2009 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +10.9% |
| 2010 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2011 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 2012 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +12.8% |
| 2013 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -18.9% |
| 2014 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +21.3% |
| 2015 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +31.8% |
| 2016 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +10.3% |
| 2017 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 2018 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -14.2% |
| 2019 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +1.0% |
| 2020 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +14.3% |
| 2021 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -26.8% |
| 2022 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +17.7% |
| 2023 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2024 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, 1.5× the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, 1.1× the median. (31 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 709.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2051 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp in Belarus?
- Fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp in Belarus was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1995.
- What is the lowest fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Belarus rank for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp?
- Belarus ranks 51st out of 113 countries with data for 2024.
- Is fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.