Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP in Australia
Australia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP in Australia, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp in Australia stood at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 32.2% on the previous year and down 21.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp in Australia peaked at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1966 and was at its lowest, 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
Australia ranks 102nd of 113 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP in Australia, year by year
| Year | kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +25.6% |
| 1963 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -47.9% |
| 1964 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +18.7% |
| 1965 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +178.2% |
| 1966 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +32.5% |
| 1967 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -19.3% |
| 1968 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +20.0% |
| 1969 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1970 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -25.1% |
| 1971 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -45.1% |
| 1972 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +71.5% |
| 1973 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -45.5% |
| 1974 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -25.8% |
| 1975 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +9.8% |
| 1976 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1977 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1978 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +23.2% |
| 1979 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -17.0% |
| 1980 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 1981 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1982 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 1983 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 1984 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -16.4% |
| 1985 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +59.8% |
| 1986 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +0.9% |
| 1987 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 1988 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -34.7% |
| 1989 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 1990 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 1991 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +16.5% |
| 1992 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 1993 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -18.2% |
| 1994 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -16.4% |
| 1995 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +6.7% |
| 1996 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1997 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 1998 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +7.7% |
| 1999 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -13.9% |
| 2000 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +17.0% |
| 2001 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 2002 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +10.9% |
| 2003 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -18.1% |
| 2004 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -22.1% |
| 2005 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 2007 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 2008 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 2009 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +7.7% |
| 2010 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -24.8% |
| 2011 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -32.0% |
| 2012 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +20.0% |
| 2013 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +9.4% |
| 2014 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +6.4% |
| 2015 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +28.3% |
| 2016 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2017 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -30.3% |
| 2018 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +13.1% |
| 2019 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -23.1% |
| 2020 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +14.8% |
| 2021 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +8.5% |
| 2022 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 2023 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -27.4% |
| 2024 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +32.2% |
Australia compared with similar countries
- Australia's 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, 12% of the median. (31 countries reporting)
- Australia's 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, 51% of the median. (11 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP in Australia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1965 | +178.2% | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Australia
More agriculture & rural data for Australia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 13.97 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0227 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,476 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.5855 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1228 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.5% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp in Australia?
- Fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp in Australia was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp recorded in Australia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1966.
- What is the lowest fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp recorded in Australia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Australia rank for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp?
- Australia ranks 102nd out of 113 countries with data for 2024.
- Is fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Australia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Australia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.