Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per square kilometre in Uruguay
Uruguay: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per square kilometre was 0 t per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per square kilometre in Uruguay, 1961–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
Uruguay recorded 0 t per square kilometre for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per square kilometre in 2004. That is the lowest value across all 44 years on record.
Over the whole period, fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per square kilometre in Uruguay peaked at 0.004 t per square kilometre in 1973 and was at its lowest, 0 t per square kilometre, in 1993.
That places Uruguay 103rd out of 118 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per square kilometre in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | +87.9% |
| 1963 | 0.0037 t per square kilometre | +99.1% |
| 1964 | 0.0039 t per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1965 | 0.0025 t per square kilometre | -37.4% |
| 1966 | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 1967 | 0.0015 t per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 1968 | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 1969 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | -23.9% |
| 1970 | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 1971 | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1972 | 0.0021 t per square kilometre | +58.9% |
| 1973 | 0.004 t per square kilometre | +89.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0016 t per square kilometre | -59.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0012 t per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0012 t per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1977 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 1978 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1979 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | -45.9% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -75.4% |
| 1981 | 0 t per square kilometre | -80.6% |
| 1982 | 0 t per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 1983 | 0 t per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 1984 | 0 t per square kilometre | +112.5% |
| 1985 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | +564.7% |
| 1986 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | +248.7% |
| 1987 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | -69.8% |
| 1988 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1989 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1990 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | -37.9% |
| 1991 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | +325.0% |
| 1993 | 0 t per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1994 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1995 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1996 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1997 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1998 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1999 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 2000 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 2001 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 2002 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 2003 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 2004 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 0 t per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.0037 t per square kilometre. (34 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 0 t per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0439 t per square kilometre. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per square kilometre in Uruguay changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | +564.7% | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre |
| 1992 | +325.0% | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0008 t per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0021 t per square kilometre | 0.001 t per square kilometre | 0.0039 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0016 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.004 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 100 Algeria 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 101 Japan 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 102 Iraq 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Comoros 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Cyprus 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Germany 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Denmark 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Estonia 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Finland 0 t per square kilometre
- 103 Croatia 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 North Macedonia 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Malta 0 t per square kilometre
- 103 Namibia 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Portugal 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Rwanda 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Slovenia 0 t per square kilometre
- 103 Sweden 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Uruguay
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 3.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0638 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,609 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0435 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 14.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per square kilometre in Uruguay?
- Fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per square kilometre in Uruguay was 0 t per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per square kilometre recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 0.004 t per square kilometre in 1973.
- What is the lowest fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per square kilometre recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Uruguay rank for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per square kilometre?
- Uruguay ranks 103rd out of 118 countries with data for 2004.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.