Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate was 3.31 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2024, fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) stood at 3.31 % change on previous year.
That represents a change of up 147.4% on the previous year and up 2,229.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 53.82 % change on previous year in 1992 and was at its lowest, -17.95 % change on previous year, in 1979.
That places Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) 15th out of 30 groups with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 5.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 1.66 % change on previous year | -70.7% |
| 1964 | 3.26 % change on previous year | +96.6% |
| 1965 | 4.83 % change on previous year | +48.2% |
| 1966 | -0.8546 % change on previous year | -117.7% |
| 1967 | 1.74 % change on previous year | -303.7% |
| 1968 | 0.7716 % change on previous year | -55.7% |
| 1969 | 3.6 % change on previous year | +366.8% |
| 1970 | 1.21 % change on previous year | -66.5% |
| 1971 | 1.71 % change on previous year | +41.5% |
| 1972 | -0.203 % change on previous year | -111.9% |
| 1973 | -1.58 % change on previous year | +676.0% |
| 1974 | -9.71 % change on previous year | +516.2% |
| 1975 | -3.09 % change on previous year | -68.1% |
| 1976 | -5.29 % change on previous year | +71.1% |
| 1977 | -5.26 % change on previous year | -0.7% |
| 1978 | 13.33 % change on previous year | -353.6% |
| 1979 | -17.95 % change on previous year | -234.7% |
| 1980 | -6.78 % change on previous year | -62.2% |
| 1981 | -7.87 % change on previous year | +16.0% |
| 1982 | 3.2 % change on previous year | -140.7% |
| 1983 | 6.77 % change on previous year | +111.3% |
| 1984 | 5.4 % change on previous year | -20.3% |
| 1985 | 0.4996 % change on previous year | -90.7% |
| 1986 | -2.72 % change on previous year | -644.7% |
| 1987 | -2.62 % change on previous year | -3.9% |
| 1988 | 0.3275 % change on previous year | -112.5% |
| 1989 | -5.34 % change on previous year | -1729.6% |
| 1990 | -0.9996 % change on previous year | -81.3% |
| 1991 | 11.74 % change on previous year | -1274.4% |
| 1992 | 53.82 % change on previous year | +358.4% |
| 1993 | -4.37 % change on previous year | -108.1% |
| 1994 | -1.25 % change on previous year | -71.3% |
| 1995 | 4.85 % change on previous year | -487.5% |
| 1996 | 8.99 % change on previous year | +85.2% |
| 1997 | 10.92 % change on previous year | +21.5% |
| 1998 | -5.03 % change on previous year | -146.0% |
| 1999 | -1.97 % change on previous year | -60.9% |
| 2000 | -8.02 % change on previous year | +308.1% |
| 2001 | 18.34 % change on previous year | -328.6% |
| 2002 | -3.81 % change on previous year | -120.8% |
| 2003 | -2.87 % change on previous year | -24.8% |
| 2004 | 10.17 % change on previous year | -454.5% |
| 2005 | -1.75 % change on previous year | -117.2% |
| 2006 | -8.76 % change on previous year | +400.1% |
| 2007 | -1.17 % change on previous year | -86.7% |
| 2008 | 1.24 % change on previous year | -206.2% |
| 2009 | -11.67 % change on previous year | -1043.5% |
| 2010 | -7.05 % change on previous year | -39.6% |
| 2011 | 8.06 % change on previous year | -214.2% |
| 2012 | 16.84 % change on previous year | +109.0% |
| 2013 | -5.59 % change on previous year | -133.2% |
| 2014 | -0.1556 % change on previous year | -97.2% |
| 2015 | -2.95 % change on previous year | +1796.3% |
| 2016 | 2.04 % change on previous year | -169.2% |
| 2017 | 1.38 % change on previous year | -32.3% |
| 2018 | 1.37 % change on previous year | -0.8% |
| 2019 | 3.41 % change on previous year | +148.6% |
| 2020 | -10.26 % change on previous year | -401.2% |
| 2021 | 10.79 % change on previous year | -205.2% |
| 2022 | -1.71 % change on previous year | -115.8% |
| 2023 | -6.99 % change on previous year | +309.1% |
| 2024 | 3.31 % change on previous year | -147.4% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | -1796.3% | -0.1556 % change on previous year | -2.95 % change on previous year |
| 1989 | -1729.6% | 0.3275 % change on previous year | -5.34 % change on previous year |
| 1991 | +1274.4% | -0.9996 % change on previous year | 11.74 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.58 % change on previous year | -0.8546 % change on previous year | 5.67 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | -2.68 % change on previous year | -17.95 % change on previous year | 13.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.912 % change on previous year | -7.87 % change on previous year | 6.77 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.67 % change on previous year | -5.03 % change on previous year | 53.82 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.8312 % change on previous year | -11.67 % change on previous year | 18.34 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.73 % change on previous year | -7.05 % change on previous year | 16.84 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.9715 % change on previous year | -10.26 % change on previous year | 10.79 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- 12 Argentina 21.42 % change on previous year compare
- 13 Lao People's Democratic Republic 19.02 % change on previous year compare
- 14 Brazil 15.09 % change on previous year compare
- 15 Myanmar 13.78 % change on previous year compare
- 16 France 13.22 % change on previous year compare
- 17 Malaysia 12.53 % change on previous year compare
- 18 Austria 10.97 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) 7.18 % change on previous year (2024)
- Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) 3 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) 2.45 % change on previous year (2024)
- Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) 3.14 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) 3.13 % change on previous year (2024)
- Milk, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) 2.92 % change on previous year (2024)
- Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) 6.34 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) 2.45 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross 6.53 % change on previous year (2024)
- Hen eggs in shell, fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) 0.7284 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 3.31 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 53.82 % change on previous year in 1992.
- What is the lowest fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was -17.95 % change on previous year in 1979.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th out of 30 groups with data for 2024.
- Is fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2,229.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.