Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Angola
Angola: Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre was 0.0058 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Angola, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
Angola recorded 0.0058 t per square kilometre for fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 3.6% on the previous year and up 66.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in Angola peaked at 0.0058 t per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0003 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Angola 107th out of 150 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Angola, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1972 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1973 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1974 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1976 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1977 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1978 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1979 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1980 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1981 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1983 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1984 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1985 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1986 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1988 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1989 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1991 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1992 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1993 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1995 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1996 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1997 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1998 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1999 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2001 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2002 | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2004 | 0.0015 t per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2005 | 0.0015 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0017 t per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2007 | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0021 t per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2009 | 0.0023 t per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0026 t per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0031 t per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2013 | 0.0035 t per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2014 | 0.0038 t per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2015 | 0.0042 t per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0045 t per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2017 | 0.0047 t per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2018 | 0.0048 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2019 | 0.0048 t per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2020 | 0.0049 t per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2021 | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2022 | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2023 | 0.0058 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.001 t per square kilometre | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0016 t per square kilometre | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | 0.0023 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0039 t per square kilometre | 0.0026 t per square kilometre | 0.0048 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | 0.0049 t per square kilometre | 0.0058 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Angola
- 104 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.0061 t per square kilometre compare
- 105 Gambia 0.0061 t per square kilometre compare
- 106 Liberia 0.006 t per square kilometre compare
- 108 Eswatini 0.0058 t per square kilometre compare
- 109 Honduras 0.005 t per square kilometre compare
- 110 New Caledonia 0.0049 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Angola
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 38.81 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2524 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 789.91 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.2141 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2854 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 25.2% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 25.2% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in Angola?
- Fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in Angola was 0.0058 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0058 t per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0003 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Angola rank for fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre?
- Angola ranks 107th out of 150 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is up 66.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Fat of pigs — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Fat of pigs — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Fat of pigs — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Fat of pigs — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.