FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Lithuania

Lithuania: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value was 73.72 1000 No in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
73.72 1000 No
Change on year
up 4.0%
World rank
95th
of 125 countries
All-time high
114.52 1000 No
in 2000
All-time low
65.81 1000 No
in 2009
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Lithuania, 2000–2023

02550751001252000201120232000: 114.5 1000 No2001: 103.2 1000 No2002: 105.2 1000 No2003: 106.4 1000 No2004: 107.9 1000 No2005: 92.7 1000 No2006: 89 1000 No2007: 93 1000 No2008: 67.1 1000 No2009: 65.8 1000 No2010: 70.4 1000 No2011: 74.8 1000 No2012: 69.7 1000 No2013: 78 1000 No2014: 79.5 1000 No2015: 79.5 1000 No2016: 77 1000 No2017: 81.8 1000 No2018: 79.2 1000 No2019: 77.4 1000 No2020: 68.9 1000 No2021: 70.8 1000 No2022: 70.9 1000 No2023: 73.7 1000 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 No.

Analysis

In 2023, fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value in Lithuania stood at 73.72 1000 No.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.0% on the previous year and down 5.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value in Lithuania peaked at 114.52 1000 No in 2000 and was at its lowest, 65.81 1000 No, in 2009.

That places Lithuania 95th out of 125 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Lithuania, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Lithuania, 2000 to 2023.
Year 1000 No Change
2000 114.52 1000 No
2001 103.21 1000 No -9.9%
2002 105.15 1000 No +1.9%
2003 106.39 1000 No +1.2%
2004 107.88 1000 No +1.4%
2005 92.66 1000 No -14.1%
2006 88.95 1000 No -4.0%
2007 93.04 1000 No +4.6%
2008 67.1 1000 No -27.9%
2009 65.81 1000 No -1.9%
2010 70.39 1000 No +7.0%
2011 74.82 1000 No +6.3%
2012 69.71 1000 No -6.8%
2013 78 1000 No +11.9%
2014 79.51 1000 No +1.9%
2015 79.45 1000 No -0.1%
2016 77.03 1000 No -3.0%
2017 81.82 1000 No +6.2%
2018 79.15 1000 No -3.3%
2019 77.4 1000 No -2.2%
2020 68.91 1000 No -11.0%
2021 70.82 1000 No +2.8%
2022 70.86 1000 No +0.1%
2023 73.72 1000 No +4.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 94.47 1000 No 65.81 1000 No 114.52 1000 No 10
2010s 76.73 1000 No 69.71 1000 No 81.82 1000 No 10
2020s 71.08 1000 No 68.91 1000 No 73.72 1000 No 4

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 92 Slovakia 84.59 1000 No compare
  2. 93 Liberia 82.24 1000 No compare
  3. 94 Mongolia 78.7 1000 No compare
  4. 96 Tajikistan 64.7 1000 No compare
  5. 97 Namibia 56.91 1000 No compare
  6. 98 Gambia 55.67 1000 No compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value in Lithuania?
Fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value in Lithuania was 73.72 1000 No in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 114.52 1000 No in 2000.
What is the lowest fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 65.81 1000 No in 2009.
How does Lithuania rank for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value?
Lithuania ranks 95th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is down 5.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Lithuania. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-male-value/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-male-value/lithuania/">FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.