FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Belarus

Belarus: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value was 287.04 1000 No in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
287.04 1000 No
Change on year
up 0.3%
World rank
58th
of 125 countries
All-time high
300.4 1000 No
in 2017
All-time low
241.46 1000 No
in 2015
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Belarus, 2000–2023

01002003002000201120232000: 271.4 1000 No2001: 271.4 1000 No2002: 274.7 1000 No2003: 271.8 1000 No2004: 276.9 1000 No2005: 271.3 1000 No2006: 270.3 1000 No2007: 265.8 1000 No2008: 267.9 1000 No2009: 270.1 1000 No2010: 264.8 1000 No2011: 263.1 1000 No2012: 259.7 1000 No2013: 256 1000 No2014: 253 1000 No2015: 241.5 1000 No2016: 285.8 1000 No2017: 300.4 1000 No2018: 290.1 1000 No2019: 283.5 1000 No2020: 281.4 1000 No2021: 282.4 1000 No2022: 286.1 1000 No2023: 287 1000 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 No.

Analysis

In 2023, fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value in Belarus stood at 287.04 1000 No.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.3% on the previous year and up 12.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value in Belarus peaked at 300.4 1000 No in 2017 and was at its lowest, 241.46 1000 No, in 2015.

Belarus ranks 58th of 125 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Belarus, 2000 to 2023.
Year 1000 No Change
2000 271.39 1000 No
2001 271.39 1000 No +0.0%
2002 274.71 1000 No +1.2%
2003 271.76 1000 No -1.1%
2004 276.92 1000 No +1.9%
2005 271.33 1000 No -2.0%
2006 270.31 1000 No -0.4%
2007 265.76 1000 No -1.7%
2008 267.95 1000 No +0.8%
2009 270.11 1000 No +0.8%
2010 264.83 1000 No -2.0%
2011 263.13 1000 No -0.6%
2012 259.72 1000 No -1.3%
2013 256.02 1000 No -1.4%
2014 253.04 1000 No -1.2%
2015 241.46 1000 No -4.6%
2016 285.84 1000 No +18.4%
2017 300.4 1000 No +5.1%
2018 290.13 1000 No -3.4%
2019 283.47 1000 No -2.3%
2020 281.4 1000 No -0.7%
2021 282.4 1000 No +0.4%
2022 286.05 1000 No +1.3%
2023 287.04 1000 No +0.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 271.16 1000 No 265.76 1000 No 276.92 1000 No 10
2010s 269.8 1000 No 241.46 1000 No 300.4 1000 No 10
2020s 284.22 1000 No 281.4 1000 No 287.04 1000 No 4

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 55 Tunisia 370.51 1000 No compare
  2. 56 Zimbabwe 359.02 1000 No compare
  3. 57 Portugal 313.3 1000 No compare
  4. 59 Papua New Guinea 276.1 1000 No compare
  5. 60 El Salvador 272.93 1000 No compare
  6. 61 Burundi 263.23 1000 No compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value in Belarus?
Fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value in Belarus was 287.04 1000 No in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 300.4 1000 No in 2017.
What is the lowest fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 241.46 1000 No in 2015.
How does Belarus rank for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value?
Belarus ranks 58th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 12.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-male-value/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-male-value/belarus/">FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.