FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Belgium

Belgium: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value was 140.79 1000 No in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
140.79 1000 No
Change on year
down 1.5%
World rank
68th
of 125 countries
All-time high
165.69 1000 No
in 2007
All-time low
114.29 1000 No
in 2021
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Belgium, 2000–2023

0501001502000201120232000: 159.8 1000 No2001: 149.2 1000 No2002: 163 1000 No2003: 143.3 1000 No2004: 143.9 1000 No2005: 164 1000 No2006: 153.3 1000 No2007: 165.7 1000 No2008: 131.1 1000 No2009: 128.6 1000 No2010: 136.1 1000 No2011: 124.3 1000 No2012: 122.5 1000 No2013: 127 1000 No2014: 124.7 1000 No2015: 124.2 1000 No2016: 123.5 1000 No2017: 133.3 1000 No2018: 140.8 1000 No2019: 150.2 1000 No2020: 128.8 1000 No2021: 114.3 1000 No2022: 143 1000 No2023: 140.8 1000 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 No.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value in Belgium is 140.79 1000 No, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.5% on the previous year and up 10.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value in Belgium peaked at 165.69 1000 No in 2007 and was at its lowest, 114.29 1000 No, in 2021.

That places Belgium 68th out of 125 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Belgium, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Belgium, 2000 to 2023.
Year 1000 No Change
2000 159.79 1000 No
2001 149.2 1000 No -6.6%
2002 163 1000 No +9.2%
2003 143.34 1000 No -12.1%
2004 143.93 1000 No +0.4%
2005 164.03 1000 No +14.0%
2006 153.34 1000 No -6.5%
2007 165.69 1000 No +8.1%
2008 131.06 1000 No -20.9%
2009 128.62 1000 No -1.9%
2010 136.05 1000 No +5.8%
2011 124.29 1000 No -8.6%
2012 122.53 1000 No -1.4%
2013 127.04 1000 No +3.7%
2014 124.69 1000 No -1.8%
2015 124.24 1000 No -0.4%
2016 123.55 1000 No -0.6%
2017 133.27 1000 No +7.9%
2018 140.78 1000 No +5.6%
2019 150.22 1000 No +6.7%
2020 128.78 1000 No -14.3%
2021 114.29 1000 No -11.3%
2022 143 1000 No +25.1%
2023 140.79 1000 No -1.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 150.2 1000 No 128.62 1000 No 165.69 1000 No 10
2010s 130.67 1000 No 122.53 1000 No 150.22 1000 No 10
2020s 131.72 1000 No 114.29 1000 No 143 1000 No 4

Countries ranked near Belgium

  1. 65 Liberia 189.49 1000 No compare
  2. 66 Austria 181.31 1000 No compare
  3. 67 Kyrgyzstan 164.91 1000 No compare
  4. 69 Panama 132.31 1000 No compare
  5. 70 Costa Rica 131.59 1000 No compare
  6. 71 Switzerland 121.82 1000 No compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Belgium

All data for Belgium →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value in Belgium?
Fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value in Belgium was 140.79 1000 No in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value recorded in Belgium?
The highest recorded value was 165.69 1000 No in 2007.
What is the lowest fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value recorded in Belgium?
The lowest recorded value was 114.29 1000 No in 2021.
How does Belgium rank for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value?
Belgium ranks 68th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value rising or falling in Belgium?
Over the last ten years it is up 10.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Belgium data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Belgium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/belgium/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/belgium/">FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Belgium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.